This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Natural Gas Emissions vs. Unaccounted For Gas

The Obama Administration’s “Strategy to Cut Methane Emissions,” released at the end of March, included recognition that efforts to modernize infrastructure and enhance pipeline safety have significantly contributed to a declining trend in natural gas emissions. Indeed, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks, emissions from utility-owned distribution systems have dropped 22 percent since 1990 and nearly 90 percent of these emissions declines are due to the pipeline replacements utilities have completed.

Safety remains the top priority for natural gas utilities. It is a core value for the local distribution companies and their employees who live and work in the neighborhoods they serve. These utilities have delivered clean energy to homes and businesses safely and reliably for generations. They remain vigilant and deeply committed to continually upgrading infrastructure and gathering accurate information to help government, industry and other stakeholders work together to develop sound, data-driven policies for the benefit of our nation’s energy future.

An issue that is occasionally raised is the appropriateness of relying upon unaccounted for gas, sometimes referred to as LAUF or LUAF, as an indicator of natural gas emissions. Because the concept of unaccounted for gas incorporates the effects of numerous factors, including many which have nothing to do with emissions, it should not be used as an indicator or a reliable proxy to measure emissions from a natural gas delivery system.

Unaccounted for gas is a term defined for regulatory accounting purposes to represent the inevitable imbalance that exists at any given time between the measured gas coming into a utility distribution system and the measured gas going out of the same system. The cost of unaccounted for gas is calculated through accounting and ratemaking measures, and these measures differ from state to state.

Typically, at a city gate, natural gas is transferred from an interstate or intrastate pipeline to a local natural gas utility. At that moment, the utility would measure the volume of gas using sophisticated technology that is able to quickly and precisely take into account a variety of factors, including temperature, pressure and in some cases gas composition. The utility then delivers gas to homes and businesses that use it as an affordable and efficient source of energy to heat their water, warm their living and work spaces, and cook their food. Upon delivery, the utility adds up the total volume of gas sold to customers as represented on their bills and reports it to their local utility commission. The customer billing cycles occur throughout the month and typically do not match the same time period as the city-gate deliveries. The difference between the city-gate measurement and the volume of gas sold, a figure used strictly for accounting purposes, is considered unaccounted for gas. Unaccounted for gas therefore does not constitute an accurate measure of emissions.

To further support that point, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which carefully tracks all greenhouse gas emissions, rejects the idea that unaccounted for gas could provide an indication of emissions or could be used to formulate policy on emissions.

There are a number of factors that can contribute to unaccounted for gas and, in an effort to bring clarity to this discussion of our shared goal of a safe, resilient, clean energy infrastructure, the American Gas Association has created this chart:

Gas Assessments

For a pdf file of the inforgraphic with additional information, please click the image above, or here.

Dave McCurdy's picture

Thank Dave for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 9, 2014

Dave, what’s a typical value for LAUF percentage-wise?

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »