This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


The Most Interesting Climate Policy Debate You Haven't Heard Of

Joseph Romm's picture
American Progress
  • Member since 2018
  • 1,651 items added with 350,598 views
  • May 27, 2014
carbon tax debate

Former GOP Rep. Bob Inglis debates a carbon tax in front of a conservative audience

It occurred last June between two groups of conservatives.

On the do-nothing side were well-known climate-science deniers, James Taylor of Heartland and David Kreutzer of Heritage Foundation. On the other side was R Street senior fellow Andrew Moylan along with former 6-term GOP congressman Bob Inglis (SC). Inglis leads the Energy and Enterprise Initiative (E&EI), an organization dedicated to finding a conservative approach to climate change built around a revenue-neutral carbon tax.

Here is the interesting part. The debate was in front of a largely conservative audience, and yet:

At the conclusion of the debate, a straw poll was taken and approximately 80% of the audience indicated they favored taxing carbon emissions in return for a dollar-for-dollar tax swap on something else (FICA taxes, corporate income taxes, etc.).

So in an actual debate for conservatives and by conservatives, the winner by far was serious climate action. Here is a video story on the debate, courtesy of the Showtime TV series — tonight’s episode features Taylor and his work with ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council) to kill windpower, as well as a story on methane leaks:

Clash of the Conservative Titans from YEARS of LIVING DANGEROUSLY on Vimeo.

You can watch the entire debate at the E&EI website.

The post The Most Interesting Climate Policy Debate You Haven’t Heard Of appeared first on ThinkProgress.

Engineer- Poet's picture
Engineer- Poet on May 28, 2014

… his work with ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council) to kill windpower

If I understand correctly, the ALEC push is to kill windpower mandates.  If that is sufficient to kill wind power, then it was being subsidized by other energy sources all along.

Engineer- Poet's picture
Engineer- Poet on Jun 2, 2014

A great deal of American land is unsuitable for grain, fruit or vegetable crops.  The only way for grasslands to produce human food is by grazing animals for meat or milk, and forests principally yield game animals.  Just how it is.

Joseph Romm's picture
Thank Joseph for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »