This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Limitations of Unreliable Energy Sources, aka 'Renewables'

Rod Adams's picture
President and CEO Adams Atomic Engines, Inc.
  • Member since 2006
  • 969 items added with 253,646 views
  • Nov 23, 2013 1:00 am GMT
  • 3549 views

Your access to Member Features is limited.

renewables limitations

As part of the discussions stimulated by their airing of Pandora’s Promise, CNN hosted a debate between Michael Shellenberger of the Breakthrough Institute and Dale Bryk of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

That debate included some commentary that I thought was worth promoting to the front page.

A commenter named Fred, a tech who has worked in the power generation industry on hydroelectric and diesel power systems, provided the following background information for Shellenberger and others that might engage in debates about energy sources in the future.

Shellenberger really missed the ball by not mentioning the inherent energy inefficiency of the main renewables: wind & solar.

  1. Induced cycling inefficiency in the shadowing fossil fuel power plants
  2. Necessity of long distance power transmission to get rid of surpluses and import shortages due to the vagaries of wind & solar, waste energy in transmission & the energy of construction & maintenance of the transmission lines
  3. Economics of heavily subsidized fluctuating renewables favors low capital cost, low efficiency generation to backup and shadow the Wind & Solar. That is mostly diesel generation, OCGT and archaic low efficiency coal burners. Utilities are now being forced to pay expensive capacity payments to keep these inefficient generators operational.
  4. The inevitable overbuild that comes with wind & solar generation. Even renewables advocates admit that. In order to supply peak energy, winter in the north, summer in the south you need to greatly overbuild the renewables. That inevitably means throwing energy away in the fall & spring. Compounded by the fact that hydro is max in the spring, when energy demand is minimum. That is the epitome of energy inefficiency.
  5. Need to heat & power wind turbines when they are not generating electricity, especially in the north.
  6. The inherent energy inefficiency of energy storage, very much needed by wind & solar. Typically batteries with about a 70% round trip energy efficiency. Pumped hydro about 80-90%. CAES about 65%. Hydrogen about 40%. Add to that the embodied energy in all that additional infrastructure.

In his response to my request for his permission to promote his comment to the front page, Fred added the following information:

One additional point on electricity transmission. The substations, transformers, switchgear and transmission lines must be sized to carry peak load, while only carrying an average ~15% of peak for solar & ~30% of peak for wind. The actual transmission conductors are made of aluminum. A high energy input material. Normally the conductor size & number of conductors is determined by economics, the marginal cost of increasing conductor size or number of parallel conductors to reduce line loss should equal the revenue gained by the increase in available power sold.

With solar & wind you are only transmitting a highly peaked power for an average of a few hours per day, so it is not economical to reduce line loss to a minimum by adding a lot of aluminum. Thus line losses are going to be considerable for long distance transmission. An absurd fantasy to send solar from the SW to match wind from the plains. A ridiculous waste of energy.

Like Fred, I am intimately aware of the limitations of wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, and hydro energy sources. Despite all of the attractive sales pitches that have been given for the past 40-50 years, I believe that continued pursuit of them as major contributors to our energy supply will impoverish our society, even if a few people at the top of the economic heap may be able to continue to live like nobility.

This is an area where I often part with other energy observers; building large scale wind and solar power systems is inherently a bad idea. It is not because the systems do not scale well; it is because they depend on diffuse, highly variable energy flows that cannot be controlled by humans or human-designed control systems.

Bright, observant people — starting with the first people who learned to control fire — have been struggling for millennia to develop machines and systems that enabled them to control their environments. As a species, we have worked hard to eliminate the limitations imposed by nature. Why are so many people enthralled with the idea of going back to a time when weather and climate tightly limited our daily routines? Do they really believe that life without controllable energy supplies is wonderfully utopian?

The post Limitations of unreliable energy sources (aka “renewables”) appeared first on Atomic Insights.

Photo Credit: Renewables Limitations/shutterstock

Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Marijan Pollak's picture
Marijan Pollak on Mar 5, 2014

Mr. Martin,

Kindly read my posts. my WindSolar Power Plants solve all problems You mention and would be able to replace all fossile fuels burning plants as they can work 24/365 guaranteed, on or off Grid. In addition my new WPSs do not need electricity for their own work, so they cannot bring the Grid down like standard WPSs, and due to use of slow wind can be located nearly anywhere, specially if built in new Skyscrapers, also of my design. WindSolars could also provide energy storage for standard WindFarms, so there would be no need to refrain from use of wind nor it would not need to be paid for that, too. 

Moreover, since heat would be available for generating steam in CSP Solar part of WindSolar all the time, it is not problem to switch it off when wind appears nor to fast switch it on when wind stop, unlike standard thermal Power Stations that have to heat their boilers long time to get steam. 

So kindly stop lamenting and spreading such dezinformations about Wind and Sun use.

Robert Bernal's picture
Robert Bernal on Mar 5, 2014

We need to stop the tar sands thus we need a BETTER source of power. That source is closed cycle nuclear. Search LFTR and IFR (they are FAR safer and better than the LWR (search that too if you don’t know what a LWR is).

I’m not against renewables, just against expensive renewables without storage!

Robert Bernal's picture
Robert Bernal on Mar 6, 2014

Links?

Got to see it to believe it. 

Pages

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »