This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Landmark Climate Law Directs Electric Utilities to Displace Oil Companies

Max Baumhefner's picture

I am an attorney, outdoor enthusiast, and a bread baker. My focus is the juncture of the electricity and transportation sectors. I work on policies designed to integrate electric vehicles into...

  • Member since 2018
  • 15 items added with 11,092 views
  • Sep 14, 2015

Within 15 years, California will generate at least half of its electricity from renewable resources and double savings from energy efficiency gains, two milestones included in Senate Bill (SB) 350. News coverage of this bill prior to its passage overlooked these monumental targets and focused on the oil companies’ unsightly lobbying to remove a petroleum reduction goal from the bill. Meanwhile, few have noticed the provisions of Senator de León’s legislation that make replacing oil as the dominant transportation fuel a core mission of the electric industry — allowing Californians to “fill up” at home on cleaner electricity that’s the cost equivalent of dollar-a-gallon gas.

Gas-Electric Pump v2.jpgRecent analysis concludes mass adoption of electric cars, trucks, and buses would cut California’s petroleum use by 18 percent in 2030. To get there, people need to be able to plug-in their vehicles where they live, work, and play. Electric utilities can make this happen. That’s why SB 350 concludes: “Widespread transportation electrification requires electrical corporations to increase access to the use of electricity as a transportation fuel.”

Senator Kevin de León’s landmark bill also establishes that, a “principal goal” of electric utility “resource planning and investment” is “to improve the environment and to encourage the diversity of energy resources through improvements in energy efficiency, development of renewable energy resources, and widespread transportation electrification.”

California’s investor-owned utilities are multi-billion dollar corporations that make investments on a scale that could actually erode the monopoly enjoyed by Big Oil for far too long.

And, unlike the oil industry, the electric industry is closely regulated by state agencies, such as the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Using this authority, SB 350 directs the CPUC to order the electric utilities under its jurisdiction to:

…file applications for programs and investments to accelerate widespread transportation electrification to reduce dependence on petroleum, meet air quality standards, achieve the goals set forth in the Charge Ahead California Initiative, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

Reducing dependence on petroleum is self-explanatory, but the other goals listed in this legislative directive deserve unpacking:

  • Meeting air quality standards means complying with fast approaching federal Clean Air Act deadlines. To do this, we need to essentially stop burning fossil fuels in the greater Los Angeles metro area and in the Central Valley, which still suffer from some of the dirtiest air in the nation.
  • Achieving the goals of the Charge Ahead California Initiative means placing one million electric vehicles on California’s roads by 2023 and ensuring that communities historically exposed to a disproportionate share of air pollution enjoy the benefits of zero-emission vehicles.
  • Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases to the levels specified by SB 350 means we need to generate electricity almost exclusively from renewable resources like wind and solar and use that clean electricity to power our cars, trucks, buses, trains, forklifts, etc.

Given the scale of these goals and the imperative to act quickly to meet them, the utility “programs and investments to accelerate widespread transportation electrification” required by SB 350 cannot be small-potato pilots. They must be transformative investments that make driving on electricity more convenient than driving on gasoline.

The widespread adoption of electric vehicles enabled by this investment should actually pay dividends for all utility customers. Under California law, when electric utilities take in new revenue (in this case, money that would have gone to oil companies), they are required to return any surplus to customers in the form of lower electric rates.

Thankfully, California’s utilities have already stepped up to the plate, proposing a collective $1.1 billion investment in electric vehicle charging infrastructure and other market acceleration programs. Those proposals are designed to charge cars when there is spare capacity in the electric grid and when wind and solar energy are abundant, in line with another directive contained in SB 350:

Deploying electric vehicles should assist in grid management, integrating generation from eligible renewable energy resources, and reducing fuel costs for vehicle drivers who charge in a manner consistent with electrical grid conditions.

In other words, utility efforts to accelerate widespread transportation electrification required by SB 350 should also lower the costs of meeting SB 350’s goal of generating at least half of California’s electricity from renewable resources like wind and solar.

Cars, trucks, and buses powered with clean, domestic electricity, the price of which doesn’t jump through the roof every time a hurricane hits the Gulf of Mexico or a refinery explodes in Richmond — a vision that will be the law of the land in the Golden State as soon as Governor Brown signs SB 350.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Sep 15, 2015

Max, so…EVs will only be able to drive when the sun is shining, or the wind is blowing?

Of course not, because the real purpose of SB 350 is to permit natural gas to take over where gasoline left off in California transportation. That’s right – here in California “Big Oil” has successfully manipulated dopey antinuclear activists to be their front line, and natural gas now generates more than half of California electricity. That’s what will be charging all those electric cars at night when the sun isn’t shining, and the windmills aren’t tweedling, spewing carbon at a rate of 1 pound/kilowatthour. Ironic, huh?

In 2013 Royal Dutch Shell, for the first time in history, made more money selling natural gas than gasoline. And thanks to wide-eyed innumerates pushing “renewables”, fossil fuels will get a second life even more lucrative than the first.

Don’t believe me? In there’s a listing for a 17,000-employee megalith called Sempra Energy, described as

American natural gas utilities holding company based in San Diego, California. It divides its interests into two broad categories: Sempra Utilities, including Pacific Enterprises/Southern California Gas Company and San Diego Gas & Electric; and Sempra Global, a holding company for businesses not subject to California utilities regulation, chiefly Sempra International and Sempra US Gas & Power.

“San Diego Gas and Electric”…how convenient…think of all the bread they could bake with that. But the story gets better: guess who was a top recipient when Sempra was doling out political contributions? None other than Kevin DeLeon himself, author of SB 350, along with over 200 other California senators and representatives.

Sounds like CEO Debra Reed got more than her money’s worth with this landmark scam, and the only thing getting displaced will be polar bears from the Arctic. Fossil Fuelz for Fossil Foolz! Natgas, 4-evah! Thanks for doing your part.

Max Baumhefner's picture
Thank Max for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »