This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

A just transition is both possible and necessary

image credit: https://www.vecteezy.com/vector-art/663002-wind-turbines-farm-design

Getting to net zero is the biggest challenge of our lifetime and the personal goal for many of you reading this.  As energy professionals we have already achieved much.  But the next stage of our journey will be harder. 

Progress to date has largely been achieved by decarbonising the power sector, and it has had little impact on peoples’ daily lives.  As we decarbonise transport and heat this will not be the case.  People will be asked to drive less and buy EVs.  They will be asked to replace natural gas boilers for hydrogen ready equivalents, install heat pumps or connect to heat networks.  The impacts will be immediate and visible.  The benefits will often be indirect and deferred.  Delivering this will need widespread public consent, engagement and participation.   

Your access to Member Features is limited.

Please or apply for membership to continue reading this post.

Only a transition seen by all as being fair and equitable will command that consent, engagement and participation.  We will therefore fail to make the transition if we fail to make the transition just.

But what is a “just transition”, why does it matter and how can we deliver it?

A just transition starts by using the opportunity of large low carbon investments to create decent work for all.  National Grid estimate 400k new roles will be needed in the energy sector[1].  The LSE found that the manufacture of EVs and batteries here in the UK could create up to 80k new jobs[2].  BEIS suggest that innovations in new low carbon manufacturing technologies could support a further 80k jobs[3]

Against this is the fact that many jobs in fossil fuel related industries will be lost.  Many of these jobs are found in specific cities and regions.  For example, a significant share of employment around Aberdeen is focused on an oil and gas sector projected to see global demand reductions of 85% and 70% respectively by 2050[4].    

Whilst the net impact of the transition should be positive for jobs, the distribution of the impact is therefore unequal.  Deindustrialisation has already created regional differences across the UK and there is the risk that the energy transition may exacerbate these.  Analogies to the social and economic impact coal of mine closures in the 1980s are not unwarranted.

Creating decent work for all will require national strategies to join up with regional plans like Net Zero North West, or city plans such as those in Bristol where they have big ambitions for heat network deployment.  It will require investment in jobs, skills and retraining being targeted at specific areas, tailoring solutions for different geographical needs. 

Incentivising new low carbon industries to locate themselves in area most at risk will help.  We are already seeing how this can be done with strategic Government investments in net zero emissions industrial zones[5].

A just transition would also mean tackling poverty across the UK.  The energy transition will create costs and benefits.  As we develop our delivery plans, we can ensure these costs and benefits are fairly and equitably distributed.

Whilst we know the transition will lead to lower energy costs in 2050 than would otherwise have been the case[6], it is also true that investments in energy networks, energy efficiency and scaling new technologies will add cost in the short to medium term. 

Recovering all these costs through the energy bill would be regressive.  As a percentage of income poorer households spend more on energy than wealthier households.  They are less able to substitute goods when producers pass rising energy costs on.  In extreme cases, rising energy costs may prevent more people from meeting their energy needs, exacerbating fuel poverty. 

Poorer households are also significantly less likely to be able to invest in low carbon technologies such as heat pumps, energy efficiency upgrades or EVs.  We can help them through subsidising the upfront cost of making the transition, and in doing seize an opportunity to improve their lives.  Energy efficiency will improve housing quality and health outcomes.  Zero carbon transport will contribute to better air quality and improve local streets.  Heat networks will not simply enable decarbonisation but can contribute to lower heating bills and stronger communities.

Finally, a just transition means giving people a stake or a voice in how the transition occurs.  We are already making progress here, for example with the 2019 Climate Assembly process[7].  But this is only the start of the public engagement we need to see.  An ongoing and meaningful dialogue is needed on the challenge, the journey and the outcomes we will deliver - and what it all means for individuals.  This is not just a responsibility for Government, but for all of us as energy professionals.

We can start by putting customers at the heart of our planning and delivery.  One such opportunity can be seen in the heat network sector today.  Heat Trust, the organisation I represent, protects those living and working on heat networks by setting minimum customer protections standards.  But as many as 400k heat network customers still live on networks not registered with us and lack even the basic standards and protection that many of us take for granted. 

Whilst the Government is committed to addressing this, the design of future regulation is yet to be agreed.  A just transition in this context requires that customer voices are represented in this debate, and that the resulting market framework applies to all customers on all heat networks.    

A just transition is not just possible but also necessary if we are to get to net zero.  As we debate how we meet our challenge of a lifetime, we must ensure that we put customers at the heart of it all by delivering decent jobs for all, tackling poverty and social inclusion.  The benefits will be felt in more than just the energy industry.

 

 

 

 


[1] https://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/stories/community-spirit/400000-new-energy-workers-needed-power-uk-net-zero

[2] https://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/GRI_Seizing-sustainable-growth-opportunities-from-zero-emissions-passenger-vehicles-in-the-UK_FULL-REPORT.pdf

[3] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/energy-innovation-needs-assessments

[4] The CCC “Sixth Carbon Budget – The Path to Net Zero”

[5] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/green-boost-for-regions-to-cut-industry-carbon-emissions

[6] The CCC – “Net Zero – The UK’s contribution to stopping global warming”

[7] https://www.climateassembly.uk/

David Watson's picture
Thank David for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Mar 3, 2021

Just transition needs to be at the core DNA of all transformation happening right now, though it seems to be largely pushed by advocacy groups and starting to get picked up by government leaders. From the side of the utility companies and leaders, though, what's the best way they can ensure they play a part in ushering a fair and just transition? 

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Mar 3, 2021

David, just who is going to pay for all of these "decent jobs for all"? I'll tell you: decent electricity customers, who would rather save their money and:

  • Spend more time with their families,
  • Take a vacation once in a while,
  • Buy a home...

The list goes on.

In my opinion - this policy of "let's spend $billions on an expensive renewable grid, that's unreliable and unnecessary, that requires thousands of miles of added transmission, that requires dirty natural gas backup (forget 'batteries'), so poor people can have jobs to be able to pay their stratospheric electricity bills" - is an obscene conceit of wealthy Energy Policy Directors With Managerial Skills Who Need Many More Lower-Paid People to Manage.

The goal is not to make jobs, or to make investors in wind and solar farms rich. The goal is to make clean energy as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible. And nothing does it better than nuclear energy.

Ask blue collar families in Texas, without fresh water to drink, what they think of wind farms and the natural gas plants needed to back them up. Texas is an example for anyone who believes making the job of fighting climate change harder just so people can have jobs is not an arrogant, self-serving one, and a huge step backwards.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »