This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Joelle Westlund - Climate talks end in disappointment

As the COP16 comes to a final close, developing countries have yet to see extended commitments towards the Kyoto Protocol.

Japan has reiterated its position on the future of Kyoto, arguing that China, India and the United States must fulfill their obligations to emission reductions through the signing of a new treaty. In stark contrast, Bolivian President Morales has given an ultimatum: “There are two ways: either capitalism dies or Mother Earth dies.”

World Bank President Robert Zoellick has said that China and India have complicated the bifurcation between rich and poor nations since both countries are developing and responsible for much of today’s global emissions.

India, on the other hand, appears to shifting its position on signing a legally binding agreement to achieve a compromise. Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh stated “All countries must make binding commitments in appropriate legal form… I have nuanced our position.”

The proposed “Green Fund” which would gather and distribute funds running to perhaps $100bn per year by 2020, was outright rejected by some developing countries on the basis that it was a ‘western-run’ institution. For highly vulnerable nations, especially island nations, want to see the fund established as soon as possible.

A World Bank report has estimated that the cost of climate adaptation in the developing world would amount to $75-100bn per year. Yet proposals that have been put forward have continuously been dismissed by opposing parties. Perceived ‘western’ proposals, have been the basis for rejection by many developing countries, especially those in Latin America. Other developing countries were not impressed with the hard-line stance that countries like Bolivia have taken.

The negotiations of this annual meeting has been deemed a “zombie process” with a lack of successful outcome and the unwillingness for an effective compromise to be made between developing and developed countries. And while “The new document is strong on acknowledging the scale of the problem, [it] does not commit parties to new measures to curb emissions”, said environment correspondent Richard Black.

Climatico Analysis's picture

Thank Climatico for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »