This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Guns, Garbage and Gas: A Sampling of COP16 Side Events

lgog

While most of my posts from Cancún have focused on the progress in the climate negotiations, that is only one element of the UN climate change conference. Each day there are dozens of side events where researchers and policymakers talk about specific responses to the climate crisis.

This afternoon as the high level ministers delivered their statements on the negotiations, I attended three side events.  These give you a flare for what one could expect to encounter in a typical day.

The first one was organized by the European Parliament and focused onj what the EU is doing on the policy front to encourage energy efficiency.  For many of the developed countries, a significant proportion of their emissions are the result of waste.

Recognizing that waste is one of the “low-hanging fruit,” that should be easy to eliminate with education and the right incentive structure, they have adopted some pretty simple and inexpensive policies to address this issue.  Ivo Belet talked about the new energy labeling program, where by the end of next year, many products will have to have written on their packaging their greenhouse gas content.  He discussed specifically a new labeling system for automobile tires, saying that tire performance is a strong determinant of fuel efficiency.  Give consumers the information, and they are more likely to make smart purchases.  Conincidentially, a group of Republican-led House members came out today against better auto fuel labeling in the US.  The EU is implementing a lot of simple and effective policies.  One wonders why policymakers in the US are incapable of learning from their European counterparts.

Later, I went to a side event sponsored by the government of Brazil.  Two researchers from the Institute of Applied Economic Research presented work estimating the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that could be mitigated from stronger recycling programs in the country.  They proposed a shift in the incentive system to give a better price for certain recyclables based on their total ecological worth, rather than their simple market price.

The last event I went to was sponsored by the United States Departement of State and involved three uniformed representatives from the Department of Defense.   The topic was the national security consequences of climate change–a topic that gets very little treatment in both the political and policy circles.

The Pentagon representatives portrayed themselves as fully engaged with the implications of climate change.  The bulk of the discussion by the presenters, however, was on adaptation.  Given the fact that many military bases–particularly naval–are situated in threatened environments, it makes sense that they would be concerned with the impacts of climate change.  They mentioned that climate change is given treatment in the Quadrennial Defense Review–a major departmental strategic document.

I found it interesting to hear these servicemen talk about the climate threat and to reflect on the disfunction in Congress on climate.  Many of the most anti-science members of Congress  like Inhofe or Fred Upton also purport to be “pro-military.”  I’m wondering how they resolve these incongruities!

Discussions

Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
David Lewis's picture
David Lewis on Dec 11, 2010

“Its only in North America that people who take climate change seriously are only on the left and people who doubt it are on the right”  Quoted from Gwynne Dyer, a military analyst who has studied the military implications of climate change. 

He writes a newspaper column on international affairs which is carried by 175 newspapers in 45 countries. He was a Senior Lecturer in War Studies at Sandhurst, the U.K.’s equivalent to West Point, before getting into being a columnist.  He has direct contacts with top military people all over the world. 

The context for that introductory quote is seen here.  Dyer was lecturing and mentioned a world famous climate institute in England:  “The Hadley Center…  It was opened by the way by Margaret Thatcher.  Its only in North America that people who take climate change seriously are only on the left and people who doubt it are on the right.  In the rest of the world it’s not a left/right issue any more than gravity is.  Margaret Thatcher was to the right of Attila The Hun, but she was a scientist.  So, the Hadley Center….”  and he went on to make some point about how the Hadley Center worst case prediction is taken as serious by military types, because the implications for altering factors that have always led to war in the past are so drastic. 

He’s written “Climate Wars” a book which discusses various climate change scenarios in terms of what the military implications are.  He interviewed top climatologists, as well as canvassing his military contacts, to prepare to write this. 

A typical written record of interview with him as he flogs his book is here. 

An extended video of a lecture he gave in British Columbia.  He is Canadian although he lives now in London. 

A short podcast  

Hugh Bartling's picture

Thank Hugh for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »