This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Groundbreaking clean truck initiative will reduce air pollution in California

EDF  Energy Exchange's picture
Blog Environmental Defense Fund

EDF's energy experts discuss how to accelerate the transition to a clean, low-carbon energy economy. Guided by science and economics, EDF tackles urgent threats with practical solutions. Founded...

  • Member since 2018
  • 1,004 items added with 920,078 views
  • Apr 30, 2020

By Lauren Navarro

California recently released new details of a plan to bring more affordable electric trucks, vans and buses to market while also reducing harmful air pollution. The latest proposal reflects calls from California Air Resources Board members to increase the number of electric trucks sold under the rule and to ensure that the benefits of cleaner air they bring will reach disadvantaged communities.

If adopted, the state will require truck manufacturers to produce more electric or zero-emission vehicle options. Beginning in 2024, at least 9% of vocational trucks (like package-delivery vans and beverage-delivery box trucks) will need to be electric (or another kind of ZEV). By 2035, nearly 75% of these trucks will be electric or ZEV. The proposal sets similar schedules for other truck types.

Focusing on the electrification of heavy-duty vehicles makes a tremendous amount of sense for California. Existing diesel trucks are a huge source of California’s air pollution, even though medium- and heavy-duty trucks account for only about 7% of all vehicles on the road. For example, these dirty vehicles are responsible for 35% of the state’s nitrogen oxide — the harmful tailpipe pollution linked to a number of health problems. Thousands of people die each year in California because of health complications associated with harmful emissions from the transportation sector. Converting dirty fleets to zero-emission vehicles will undoubtedly improve the health of the 12 million Californians — about one-third of the state’s population — living in areas with exceedingly bad pollution levels. And, unsurprisingly, it is often the poorest neighborhoods and communities that are hit the hardest.

This electric conversion has economic benefits too. The operational savings in fuel and maintenance costs over the span of the vehicle’s lifetime make owning electric trucks more affordable than traditional vehicles. This rule is expected to result in a total cost savings of nearly $6 billion for the trucking industry in California through 2040. As a result, the rule will generate more jobs in the short-term because new charging infrastructure will have to be built to power these new clean trucks.

The California Air Resources Board is scheduled to consider the final proposal at its next meeting in June. As California consider this proposal, the legislature and the governor should continue to fund complementary incentive-based programs that make it easier for companies to acquire electric vehicles.

For example, California should continue to fund a voucher system to help offset purchase costs for companies who choose to invest in zero-emission vehicles. Last year, that program, called the Hybrid and Zero-emission Truck and Bus Voucher Program, was funded at $250 million and was popular among fleet owners. The state may also want to consider other ways to attract private capital beyond the budget to expand its funding.

EDF is engaging with both the governor’s office and the legislature on these strategies. Funding clean transportation programs will give them a running start and will help the state to reap the air quality, fuel-savings and job benefits of cleaner vehicles more readily.

Any initiative that can substantially improve air quality should be hailed as a victory — especially right now. Federal attempts to eliminate clean air protections means California’s efforts are needed that much more. Californians are suffering and even dying from air pollution and we have a solution — one with a good economic outlook.

Read More

EDF  Energy Exchange's picture
Thank EDF for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »