The Generation Professionals Group is for utility professionals who work in biomass, coal, gas/oil, hydro, natural gas, or nuclear power generation fields. 

Stan Kaplan's picture
Energy Consultant KeyLogic

B.A., 1974, History, Rutgers University M.A., 1977, Public Policy, Lyndon Baines Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at AustinExpertise: Electric power and fuel marketsStan has...

  • Member since 2006
  • 38 items added with 40,223 views
  • Jul 15, 2020

Very interesting article that helps explain why the EPR projects in Finland and France have been so troubled.

Stan Kaplan's picture
Thank Stan for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jul 15, 2020

The financial challenges are major, with the cost of construction of three pairs of EPR2 reactors being estimated at EUR46 billion (2018 value)," the Cour des Comptes notes. "Taking into account their duration of construction, production and dismantling, the decision to build or not to build future EPRs will have consequences until the 22nd Century.

That phrasing, using 'the 22nd Century' as a timeline, really hammers home the point!

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jul 16, 2020

"...a lack of awareness of the loss of technical competence of industrialists in the sector..."

No loss of technical competence of industrialists in the sector, but a loss of industrialists in the sector.

Reminds me of an interview with Tim Cook, CEO of Apple Computer. When asked why he was paying $11 apiece for four screws needed for the cover of each iMac, he replied, "because we have to have them shipped from China."

Interviewer: "Why don't have them made in the U.S.?"

Cook: "Because there isn't a machine shop in the U.S. capable of making the screws to specification."

If the U.S. (or France, probably) can't make a screw to spec anymore, should we be surprised we can't make a nuclear reactor? Meanwhile, Russia and China, which make both excellent screws and nuclear reactors, are eating our lunch in global sales of both. Russia has 38 reactors in various stages of construction in Belarus, Bangladesh, Turkey, India, China, Finland, Iran, Armenia, Egypt, Hungary, Uzbekistan, Bulgaria, Ukraine, South Africa, Nigeria, Argentina, Algeria, Jordan, Vietnam, and Indonesia.

Anyone who believes the country providing power to the world doesn't hold its  geopolitical power hasn't been paying attention - and we're not talking about solar panels.


Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »