This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


European Nations are Increasing Electricity Generation Using No-Carbon Sources

map of low carbon net electricity generation in Europe, as explained in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Statistics. Note: Click to view larger map.

Penetration rates of no-carbon generation have increased from 50% to 56% in recent years in Europe, as European Union countries work toward renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions targets. Increasing levels of renewable generation, along with nuclear generation, mean that many European countries generate a large share of their electricity from no-carbon sources.

No-carbon sources generate power while releasing virtually no carbon dioxide emissions, and include geothermal, hydroelectric, nuclear, solar (both utility scale and distributed solar), tidal, and wind generation. Although biomass power plants emit carbon dioxide during operation, the full life cycle of biomass fuels is often considered to be carbon neutral for the purposes of satisfying these countries’ goals. France, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland each generated more than 90% of their net electricity from no-carbon sources in 2012, and eight other countries had no-carbon electricity accounting for at least 50% of their generation.

The share of no-carbon generation in European countries is expected to continue to increase, as the European Union’s 2020 Climate and Energy Package targets both a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions and an increase in the share of energy consumption generated from renewable sources. There has already been a substantial increase in no-carbon generation since 2002, as countries have added renewables to their generation mix (see graph). Eighteen countries generate at least one-third of their generation from no carbon sources, and 13 generate at least half, up from 13 and 10, respectively, in 2002. Increased generation from solar, wind, and biomass has made up most of the change. For example, while Germany’s overall no-carbon generation share rose only modestly between 2002 and 2012, from 38% to 41%, there has been a big shift within the no-carbon portfolio, with the nuclear generation share falling by 12 percentage points over this period. Germany’s share of solar, wind, and biomass generation increased by 15 percentage points over the same period.

Like the United States, which generated 32% of its electricity from no-carbon sources in 2012, countries in Europe generate most of their no-carbon electricity from nuclear and hydroelectric sources, along with a smaller portfolio of other renewables. There are some exceptions, however; along with hydroelectric power, almost 30% of Iceland’s total net electricity generation came from geothermal sources in 2012, while Denmark generated more than 50% of its electricity from wind and biomass.


Graph of no-carbon electricity generation share in Europe and the United States (2012), as described in the article text


Graph of no-carbon electricity generation share in Europe and the United States (2002), as described in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Statistics

Principal contributors: Brian Murphy, Alex Abramowitz

U.S. EIA: Today in Energy's picture

Thank U.S. EIA: for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Joris van Dorp's picture
Joris van Dorp on Sep 26, 2014 10:32 am GMT

Very useful information.

Notice the data for Germany and compare with its extreme policy of destroying its own nuclear power capability within ten years. Notice also France, and its recently unveiled policy objective of crushing its nuclear power sector until it only provides 50% of its power by 2025. And notice Belgium too, which has decided to eradicate its nuclear power sector by 2025 as well. And Switserland will eliminate its nuclear power sector as well, although the public seems to be rising up to protect itself from this absolute insanity.

Is it all not very strange indeed?

Is Europe on a quest to destroy its own economy and the climate as well? Do Europeans need to concern themselves with the destruction of their largest source of clean, emissions free power? Should Europeans recognise rabid and institutionalised antinuclear policy as a threat to their welfare similar in gravity to terrorism and whitecollar crime in the financial sector, for example?

Questions, questions….


Dan Mantena's picture
Dan Mantena on Sep 27, 2014 9:05 pm GMT

This article does not include the total installed capacity (GW) for each country which skews the picture. Even though Iceland is producing 100% of its electricity from renewables it is not even half of the load of Germany/France/Spain. 

USA has as much wind capacity as the EU and has a solar capacity only third to Germany and Italy.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »