This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


In an Era of Inexpensive Renewables, Policy Should Remove Obstacles

Johannes Urpelainen's picture
, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

Johannes Urpelainen is the Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz Professor of Energy, Resources and Environment at Johns Hopkins SAIS and the Founding Director of ISEP. He received his Ph.D. in Political...

  • Member since 2018
  • 45 items added with 34,673 views
  • Apr 9, 2018

Driven by decades of aggressive government policy, renewable electricity generation has grown rapidly. This expansion has, in turn, contributed to lower costs and renewable power that is no longer prohibitively expensive. In fact, wind and solar power are already cheaper than coal-fired power generation or natural gas power generation. As the primary obstacles to a renewable energy transition is no longer cost, the old approach of subsidizing renewable generation until it can compete with fossil fuels no longer makes sense. Rather, the challenge stems from the need to integrate intermittent power supplies into the electric grid, and governments interested in clean energy and decarbonization can use policy to remove systemic obstacles to growth.

Governments can address this problem with real-time electricity pricing, two-way metering, demand-side management to match supply and demand, and with policies that separate electricity consumption from the cost of system maintenance. Most importantly, governments need to invest in technology innovation to support energy storage and other measures to mitigate the problem of intermittency. These policies can unleash an era of renewable energy progress and thus contribute to climate mitigation, clean air, and energy security.

The Cost of Renewable Energy Has Fallen Over Time

In 2008, both solar and wind power were very costly propositions (Lazard 2014). In 2009, the levelized cost of wind electricity generation in the United States was $101-169 per megawatt-hour (MWh) and the same cost for solar power $323-394. The price of coal, on the other hand, was about $66-151 per MWh at the time.

By 2017, however, both the sun and the winds could offer affordable power (Lazard 2017). At that time, the costs of wind and solar power had, respectively, fallen to $43-48 and $30-60 per MWh. In a stark contrast, coal-fired power generation cost $60-143. Both wind and solar power had lower generation costs than coal. While these costs do not consider the need for storage or other problems with integrating intermittent power supplies into the grid, they do show that generation costs are no longer an obstacle to a comprehensive transition to a renewable power system.

These cost reductions have contributed to a global investment boom in renewables (IEA 2017). According to the International Energy Agency (IEA 2017), renewable generation capacity increased by about 165 gigawatts in 2016, accounting for two-thirds of all new capacity. This growth was worldwide with China, India, and the United States leading the way. Record-low auction prices for solar power in the Middle East, Latin America, and India fell as low as $30 per MWh.

Policy Has Played a Key Role in Transforming Renewable Energy

It was not the invisible hand of markets that made renewable energy affordable. As our research in Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition (Aklin and Urpelainen 2018) shows, the cost reductions in renewable power generation have followed aggressive support policies in forerunner countries such as Germany, Denmark, and China. When renewable energy was still expensive relative to coal and natural gas, governments used policies such as feed-in tariffs to offer generous benefits and reduce risk to renewable power producers. These were often high-cost policies, as Germans may have at times paid over twenty billion euros for their renewable energy feed-in tariff (Aklin and Urpelainen 2018), but they got the job done: renewable energy generation grew over time, and the costs fell precipitously.

Once the cost of renewable energy reached a critical threshold, governments around the world pushed it further down with auctions and other market-based mechanisms. Even though renewable energy was still more expensive than conventional fossil fuels, the cost difference was sufficiently small to encourage project developers to respond to competitive tenders and auctions. Unlike feed-in tariffs, auctions rewarded project developers with the lowest costs and thus led to accelerated technological and business innovation.

The Time Is Ripe for Another Revolution in Renewable Energy Policy

Renewable energy has by now achieved a certain momentum that will make it difficult to stop, despite the opposition it faces from some governments. But renewables still face major obstacles to the kind of exponential growth the world needs to avoid dangerous climate disruption. Because of the intermittent nature of wind and solar power, going from marginal amounts of renewable power generation to a system that is dominated by renewables requires a policy revolution. In Germany, for example, intermittent solar and wind power accounted for almost 20% of all generation in 2016 (IEA 2017). At such levels, managing the intermittency becomes a critical policy challenge.

To address these challenges, new policies will need to encourage real-time pricing of electricity to avoid an oversupply of renewable power when the sun shines and the wind blows. Importantly, policymakers need to look for ways to enable two-way metering to ensure that distributed power generators can sell their surplus to other consumers when demand is high. Policy should also include demand-side interventions to shift electricity consumption profiles such that demand meets the supply of wind and solar power.

Additionally, all electricity consumers should contribute to covering the cost of the electric grid regardless of how many kilowatt-hours they consume and produce. If consumers paid a fee for the costs of the electric grid, distribution power generation would not threaten the finances of grid maintenance. Quite to the contrary, two-way metering would enable micro-level power exchange between households and companies that both produce and consume renewables.

Finally, technological innovation remains a critical driver of renewable energy expansion. Besides improved policy and grid management, less expensive energy storage both on small and large scales would solve the problem of intermittency. Policies should support innovations that enhance the competitiveness of renewable energy, with a particular emphasis on battery storage.

While the cost of renewable electricity generation has collapsed, removing systemic obstacles to growth in renewable energy use requires a new generation of renewable energy policy. Markets alone cannot remove barriers to a carbon-free power sector, and governments around the world should adopt new strategies focused on solving the problem of intermittency. Such a policy revolution can unlock the full potential of renewable energy.


Aklin, M and Urpelainen, J (2018). Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition. MIT Press.

IEA (2017).

Lazard (2014).

Lazard (2017).

Sivaram, V (2018). Taming the Sun: Innovations to Harness Solar Energy and Power the Planet. MIT Press.

Original Post

Engineer- Poet's picture
Engineer- Poet on Apr 9, 2018

Remove obstacles?  Subsidies, dispatch priority, externalization of costs and outright mandates are obstacles?

If wind and solar are so cheap now, it’s time for them to pay for the essential services the grid requires but they cannot supply alone.  They can pay for this either in cash out of revenues, or in kind out of energy.  For instance, excess wind energy could cut fossil fuel use by going into “heat batteries” which keep thermal plants running at minimum and ready to ramp up at any time, but without burning fossil fuels in them.  Enough of this and while low revenues might become a problem, curtailment would end.

Willem Post's picture
Willem Post on Apr 9, 2018

Wind and solar produce electricity at about 5 c/kWh only in the most favorable areas, and with subsidies of about 3 to 4 c/kWh.

In less favorable areas, such as New England, they produce at about 9 c/kWh for wind and about 13 c/kWh for large scale solar, with subsidies of about 3 to 5 c/kWh.

Residential roof mounted would be about 19 c/kWh, with subsidies of about 3 to 4 c/kWh.

Those prices do not include

the cost of batteries to stabilize grids,
the cost of peaking, filling in and balancing by the traditional generators,
the cost of grid extensions and augmentation.
the cost of storage

In Australia the largest battery system in the world, 100 MW/129MWh, $50 million, serves to stabilize the grid that was excessively roiled by nearby large wind systems.

The cost is NOT charged to French wind system owners who are the disturbers.

Johannes Urpelainen's picture
Thank Johannes for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »