Part of »

Post

Driving An Electric Vehicle Is Far Cleaner Than Driving On Gasoline Across The U.S., Regardless Of Local Power Mix

Driving an electric vehicle (EV) has obvious climate benefits: zero tailpipe emissions. But because EVs are charged by power grids that burn fossil fuels, they aren’t necessarily zero-carbon. An EV’s carbon footprint depends on whether its power comes from renewables or fossil, and quantifying exactly how clean EVs are compared to gasoline-powered vehicles has been tough – until now.

New data shows that in every corner of the United States, driving an EV produces significantly fewer greenhouse gas emissions than cars powered only by gasoline, regardless of the local power mix. Today, an average EV on the road in the U.S. has the same greenhouse-gas emissions as a car getting 80 miles per gallon (MPG). That’s up from 73 MPG in 2017, and far greater than the average gas-powered car available for sale in the U.S., which hit a record 24.7 MPG in 2016.

Average miles per gallon equivalent of electric vehicles, 2018

 

Average EV emissions have continued to decline over time thanks to accelerating coal plant closures and the decarbonization of America’s power sector (down 28% since 2007), so while burning gasoline won’t get much cleaner, driving on electricity can get cleaner every year – saving billions in health expenses and climate impacts along the way.

Average U.S. EV Emissions Equal 80 MPG In A Gas-Powered Car

The EV emissions analysis comes from the Union of Concerned Scientists(UCS), and is based on transportation fuels emissions estimates from Argonne National Laboratory and power plant emissions data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

UCS finds driving on electricity is far cleaner than gasoline – charging up an EV equals 50 MPG for 75% of U.S. drivers, and it’s much higher in regions where clean power composes a significant portion of the power mix: 102 MPG in New England, 109 MPG in California, and a whopping 191 MPG in New York State. UCS also provides comparative emissions data down to the zip code via their online calculator – for instance in my Oakland, California zip code the average new car powered only by gasoline gets 29 MPG compared to 114 MPG for an EV.

This difference between gas-powered cars and EVs is important to U.S. climate change concerns. A typical gas-powered car emits around a pound of carbon dioxide per mile traveled, and the U.S. reached an all-time high of 3.17 trillion annual vehicle miles traveled in 2016. As a result, transportation sector emissions supplanted power plant emissions as America’s top source of emissions for the first time in 2016, while electricity emissions continued a decade-long decline.

Tailpipe emissions also carry a hefty human health price tag: The American Lung Association says gasoline-powered transportation costs $37 billion in hidden impacts like asthma attacks, premature deaths, lost work days, and hospital visits across just 10 states.  Since Americans won’t stop driving cars any time soon, the cars on our roads must be as clean as possible – to get serious about cutting emissions, we must rapidly electrify transportation.

EV Sales Increasing In Time to Tap Cleaner U.S. Electricity

EV sales are rising in the U.S. just in time to capitalize on the influx of cheap and clean generation coming online across the country. EV prices are falling rapidly, and many analysts project they will soon overtake gas-powered engines as the primary source of new car sales in America.

200,000 EVs were sold across the U.S. in 2017, up from 158,000 in 2016, and sales grew an average of 32% annually between 2012 and 2016. More than 760,000 EVs are currently on the road, and while EV sales are slightly more than 1% of total U.S. light-duty vehicle sales today, they could compose 65% of all new U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2050.

U.S. electric vehicle deployment forecast to 2050

 

These rapid market expansions are happening due to rapid technology cost declines – lithium-ion battery prices have fallen 73% since 2010 and could decline another 70% by 2030, pushing EVs to price parity with gas-powered cars by 2025.

The emissions-reduction potential of EVs may hinge upon the U.S. grid’s power mix, but nearly every power plant retired since 2008 has been powered by fossil fuels, and the wave of utilities retiring coal plants sped up in 2017. Renewable energy cost declines have fallen apace, making renewables the cheapest available source of new electricity without subsidies in 2017, helping push renewable energy up to 18% of total U.S. generation – double the amount from a decade ago.

The effect of all this clean electricity being added across the country is clear in the emissions profile of EVs – driving an EV has gotten much cleaner in nearly every region of the U.S. in the past decade.

2009 UCS data in the graphic below shows just how fast EV MPG has risen: New England jumped from 75 MPG to 102 MPG, California accelerated from 78 MPG to 109 MPG, and New York State surged from 115 MPG to 191 MPG.

Average miles per gallon equivalent of electric vehicles, 2009

 

Smart Policy Can Help Drivers Go Further, Cleaner Than Ever Before

Decarbonizing our power supply is integral to making EVs cleaner, but truly plugging into the potential of EVs to decarbonize the U.S. transportation sector requires policies to accelerate consumer adoption of EVs:

  • Federal and state subsidies, which have been among the most effective policies to promote EVs up to this point, can be phased out as decreased battery costs and increased EV production lowers overall vehicle costs.
  • Governments and private entities can also accelerate EV adoption by expanding charging station access through consumer incentives, updated building codes, or permitting utilities to build charging infrastructure – which in turn allows utilities to increase stagnant power sales and increase grid stability.
  • Automakers themselves can increase EV adoption (and boost their own fortunes) by increasing awareness about the cost advantages of their ever-increasing assortment of EV models for sale – consumer awareness of EV availability continues to lag behind the number of electrified vehicles on the road.

Charging can also become a way to reduce the cost of renewables.  Unlike necessities like lighting, device charging, or air conditioning, electric vehicle charging is one of the most elastic sources of electricity demand – as long as charging is available, fast, and convenient.  Momentary fluctuations from wind and solar due to gusts of wind or cloud cover can be easily offset through managed EV fleet charging, and EVs can soak up excess renewable energy at cheap charging rates when solar or wind electricity is plentiful.

Vehicle electrification is a critical aspect of transportation sector decarbonization, and America’s rapid power sector decarbonization means EV drivers can go further, cleaner than ever before.

By Silvio MarcacciCommunications Director at Energy Innovation, where he leads all public relations and communications efforts.

Original Post

Energy Innovation's picture

Thank Energy for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.

Discussions

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Mar 22, 2018 5:20 pm GMT

Silvio, the U.S. Dept. of Energy’s GREET Model, which the Union of Concerned Scientists cites to justify the dramatic conclusion of their analysis, can be downloaded by anyone in Excel format and used to independently verify UCS’s conclusions. Being somewhat skeptical I did just that, and without investing a significant amount of time I discovered they are wrong.

I live in California. What follows is the mix of generation sources for my electricity:

30% coal
31% “natural” gas
33 % renewables
6% nuclear

When I entered this generation mix, I discovered the well-to-wheels GHG emissions while driving my EV are virtually identical to driving not a hybrid, not a diesel, but a car using conventional gasoline to power an internal-combustion engine. Below are the results.

http://www.thorium-now.org/images/burbank-ev.jpg

Because there are thousands of parameters which can be adjusted, it’s easy to game the GREET model. For example, if I based my analysis on the cleanest possible methane, assumed only anthracite coal was burned, etc. etc., I might be able to duplicate UCS’s result. But I’m not interested in that, so I used Argonne’s default assumptions. How do I know their assumptions are valid? I don’t, but at a 2015 GREET workshop at Argonne they made it clear to me they were devoted to impartial analysis, and I have no reason to doubt them.

In contrast, UCS analyses have always been plagued by irrational anti-nuclear bias – which I have no doubt played a part in this assessment. As you can see, even with 1/3 of my electricity from renewable sources, I might as well drive a car that runs on gasoline – illustrating the colossal failure of renewable energy to provide real GHG reductions in both electricity and transportation.

Yosef Shirazi's picture
Yosef Shirazi on Mar 25, 2018 2:20 am GMT

UCS is capable of doing good work in some areas, but sadly their EV air emission analysis consistently fails to follow anything that resembles best analytical practice. I’ve always been amazed that a stated goal of UCS’ transportation group is to ‘reduce oil consumption’, rather than something more technology agnostic like ‘reduce externalities from automobile use’. To some these two terms may seem synonymous, but high quality peer-reviewed research shows otherwise.

Check out some of the great work by Jeremy Michalek et al. and Stephen Holland et al. on this topic. Their more rigorous analytical methods (for example relying on marginal rather than average generation) show that on average for the US, air pollution damage from electric vehicles exceeds that from a hybrid vehicle per mile driven. Even in places where EV’s do produce lower externalities than hybrids (like the West Coast), these air benefits are less than the $7,500 in federal tax rebates EV buyers receive. But the story may be even worse for EVs, as both research groups have shown. Accounting for interactions with federal policies like CAFE, each EV sold allows a manufacturer to sell a far less efficient (dirtier) vehicle than they would have otherwise been able to see while remaining in compliance with efficiency regulations. The net result of an additional EV sold is, counter-intuitively, not just more air emissions but more petroleum consumption.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »