This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


COVID-19 throws a lemon at Virginia’s plan for an energy transition. It’s time for lemonade.

Ivy Main's picture
Publisher, Powerforthepeopleva

Ivy Main is a writer, lawyer, and environmental advocate, and volunteers extensively with the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club. In addition to lobbying in the Virginia General Assembly for...

  • Member since 2018
  • 160 items added with 365,959 views
  • May 4, 2020

solar panels on a school roof

The solar panels on Wilson Middle School are saving money for Augusta County taxpayers. Photo courtesy of Secure Futures.

In mid-March, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation to transition our economy from fossil fuels to clean energy over the coming years. Two weeks later, Virginia shut down in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the businesses whose very existence is now in peril are the energy efficiency companies and solar installers we will be counting on to get us off fossil fuels.

Home weatherization and energy efficiency programs have come to an almost complete halt in Virginia, including programs run by Dominion Energy Virginia. Nationwide, the energy efficiency sector has lost almost 70,000 jobs. Meanwhile, companies that install solar, especially rooftop systems, report plummeting sales. The Solar Energy Industries Association reports that nationally, 55 percent of solar workers are already laid off or suffering cutbacks.

The timing seems terrible — although to be fair, there’s no good time for an economy-crushing, worldwide pandemic. Eventually, however, the virus will run its course or be defeated through vaccine or cure. At that point, we will face a choice: we can stagger blinking out into the sunlight aimlessly wondering now what?, or we can execute the well-developed plan we have spent these weeks and months formulating.

Let’s go with the second option.

First, it’s worth remembering that nothing happening now will change the trajectory of clean energy. Solar and wind had banner years in 2019, continuing their steady march to dominance. Wind has become the largest single source of electricity in two states, Iowa and Kansas. The island of Kauai in Hawaii is now 56 percent powered by renewable energy, mostly solar. Across the U.S. wind, solar and hydro produce more electricity than coal. Wind is the cheapest form of new electric generation nationally; solar takes pride of place in Virginia.

Meanwhile, fossil fuel is even more firmly on its way out. Six of the top seven U.S. coal companies have gone into bankruptcy since 2015. That was before the lockdown sent energy demand down, further hurting high-priced coal.

Fracked gas helped kill coal but is itself vulnerable to price competition from renewables. Odd as it sounds, the collapse in oil prices will make natural gas more expensive. That’s because oil producers in Texas and North Dakota are closing wells that produced natural gas along with oil. The tightening supply of gas may finally make fracking companies in Appalachia profitable, but it means higher prices for utilities. Wind and solar will just keep looking better.

The Trump administration is still trying futilely to hold back the tide, but the U.S. will get a lot farther riding the wave than struggling against it. Congressional leaders should declare the country “all in” on clean energy. Instead of bailing out the highly polluting fossil fuel industries, they should put that money to work creating more jobs and economic development — and actually doing something about climate change — with energy efficiency and renewables.

Congress should return the Investment Tax Credit for solar (and offshore wind) to the 30 percent level in effect last year and keep it there, instead of continuing the phase-out now in effect. Congress should also give solar owners the option of taking the credit as a cash grant, as it did during the last recession, and for the same reason: tax-based incentives are less useful in a recession, when companies can’t use the credits.

Virginia’s Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner have a critical role to play in convincing their colleagues to support solar. So far neither is rising to the task.

On the state level, Northam did the right thing in signing this year’s energy legislation, allowing utilities and industry members to start planning for the future. But the Clean Economy Act gets wind and solar off to a very slow start; Dominion doesn’t have to build Virginia solar for five years yet. And though the new laws remove many policy constraints on customer-sited solar, they offer next to nothing in the way of financial incentives.

Governor Northam should make it clear he intends to make rooftop solar a priority for next year, along with projects on closed landfills, former coal mine areas, and other brownfields, with a special focus on areas hardest-hit economically. He can also encourage corporations that do business in Virginia to meet their sustainability goals with Virginia wind and solar, starting right now.

The governor should also prioritize building efficiency. Virginia will be adopting a new residential building code this year, and if past years are any indication, its energy efficiency provisions will fall short of the most recent model code standard. It’s up to the governor to make sure Virginia adopts the full code.

Local governments are already taking advantage of suddenly-empty buildings to accelerate maintenance and repairs. But it’s a good time to think bigger, with new financing tools available that make energy efficiency retrofits and solar facilities cash-positive right from the start.

Energy performance contracting allows the energy savings to pay for retrofits. The Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy keeps a list of pre-qualified energy service companies and offers expertise to help local government employees navigate the process.

This year’s legislation also greatly expanded local governments’ ability to finance on-site solar through third-party power purchase agreements, effective July 1. The PPAs are structured so that a school district, municipality or any commercial or non-profit customer can have a solar array installed at no cost, paying just for the energy produced.

In December, Fairfax County awarded contracts for PPAs to install solar on more than a hundred sites, including schools and other government buildings. The county’s contract is “rideable,” which allows other counties and cities to piggyback, getting the same terms without the need for new contract negotiations.

Unfortunately, local governments in southwest Virginia are prevented from pursuing PPAs — not by state legislation, which allows it starting July 1, but by a contract with Appalachian Power that governs their electricity purchases from the utility. The contract is up for renewal this year; disgracefully, APCo is refusing to agree to new terms allowing the localities to use solar PPAs. APCo should back off, and let local governments in economically depressed southwest Virginia start saving money and supporting solar jobs this year.

Arlington County has gone beyond on-site solar, contracting for a share of a large solar farm in southern Virginia that will provide more than 80 percent of the electricity for county government operations. It’s a model any locality can adopt.

Virginia residents and businesses also have good reasons to focus on clean energy. The enforced down-time many people are experiencing means more time to research options, and companies are motivated to offer low prices on energy efficiency upgrades and rooftop solar.

The federal government offers more generous tax credits this year than next. Credits for residential energy efficiency equipment and a deduction for energy efficient commercial buildings expire at the end of this year.

The investment tax credit for solar (as well as for geothermal heat pumps, fuel cells and small wind turbines) stands at 26% for projects placed in operation this year, but it will drop to 22% in 2021. It falls to 10% for commercial customers and disappears altogether for residential customers in 2022. If Congress acts to raise the credit to 30%, buyers will get an even bigger boost. If it doesn’t, there will be a rush this year to get projects done by the end of the year, so customers should secure their place in line now.

Virginia nonprofits have helped hundreds of residents and businesses save money on solar and EV chargers through bulk purchasing programs. Virginia Solar United Neighbors just announced a series of virtual information sessions to promote the Arlington Solar EV Co-op. And LEAP, which closed operations temporarily due to the virus, reports it has restarted two programs, Solarize NOVA and Solarize Piedmont.

In an ideal world, the U.S. would already be well along in executing a comprehensive plan for a clean energy transition, one that includes job retraining for workers, and that resists counterproductive efforts to save the fossil fuel industry. But we can do the next best thing, and use the tools of government, the market and consumer choice to speed us in the right direction.

COVID-19 has handed all of us a big, fat lemon. Let’s make some lemonade.

A version of this article appeared originally in the Virginia Mercury on April 30, 2020.

Read More

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 5, 2020

Ivy, what's your opinion of Michael Moore's new film, "Planet of the Humans"? There are 6 million views on YouTube and over 5K comments, the overwhelming majority of which written by disillusioned viewers who feel renewables, or the people selling them, have let them down:

  • "It’s easier to fool the masses than to convince them that they are being fooled. -Mark Twain"
  • "'Nothing is as it appears -The Buddha, in today's lingo 'it's all bollocks!'"
  • "The whole planet has been turned into a damn pyramid scheme."

You write, "First, it’s worth remembering that nothing happening now will change the trajectory of clean energy." It seems a majority of "Planet of the Humans" viewers believe the trajectory of clean energy was a deception.

Ivy Main's picture
Ivy Main on May 8, 2020

I haven't seen the movie, but I've seen wind and solar displace fossil fuel.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 5, 2020

Congressional leaders should declare the country “all in” on clean energy. Instead of bailing out the highly polluting fossil fuel industries, they should put that money to work creating more jobs and economic development — and actually doing something about climate change — with energy efficiency and renewables.

Just as you note there's no good time for a global pandemic, I'd also say this idea points to how there's no real good time in the eyes of those employed by the fossil fuel industry for them to have to shift their livelihoods elsewhere. But perhaps this is the opportunity to really pour resources into job retrainings and even placements in new projects that can take the skills of fossil fuel industry employees and put them towards cleaner energy projects? Making that part of a widely understood to be needed stimulus package, rather than line items in a typical budget, could perhaps be more fruitful-- what do you think, Ivy?

Ivy Main's picture
Ivy Main on May 8, 2020


Ron Miller's picture
Ron Miller on May 8, 2020

We see more comments now that solar and wind are cost competitive with coal, gas, and nuclear. Financial incentives such as PTC and ITC were initiated to to help renewables gain economies of scale (more installed capacity to drive unit cost down) so they could compete with fossil fuels. Once renewables are competitive, why do we still need to subsidize them? Government usually subsidizes a technology to help it get a start, however, continuing to subsidize while it is at price parity with the competing technology could be viewed as wasteful government subsidy.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 8, 2020

What about the subsidies (both direct and indirect) still enjoyed by coal, oil, and gas? Perhaps if they were all removed, it would be interesting to see how each source compared with each other

Ivy Main's picture
Ivy Main on May 8, 2020

I agree with Matt that we aren't looking at a level playing field. The energy industry has never had free market rules, and fossil fuel economics rely heavily on externalizing pollution costs. But more to your point, Ron, the problem with sitting back and letting renewable energy just slowly take over the market is that we don't have the time to wait. The ice is melting now.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 8, 2020

Agree with everything here but the assumption renewable energy can possibly "take over the market" - that it can not only displace, but replace fossil energy.

There is not a single credible, peer-reviewed scientific study which lays out as plausible scenario for replacing all coal, oil, and natural gas with renewables. Though the 100% WWS (wind, water, and sunlight) studies co-authored by Mark Z. Jacobson of Stanford's Natural Gas Initiative have been cited by renewables advocates for years, in 2017 a pre-eminent team of 21 climate experts found that

"...their analysis involves errors, inappropriate methods, and implausible assumptions. Their study does not provide credible evidence for rejecting the conclusions of previous analyses that point to the benefits of considering a broad portfolio of energy system options."

Can't be done by renewables alone, Ivy, and you're quite right - we don't have time to wait.

Planet of the Humans

Ron Miller's picture
Ron Miller on May 14, 2020

Ivy, The renewable energy industry has had the highest growth rates of power generation installations the last few years, so I question the "...just slowly take over the market" comment. Another incentive that the RE industry singularly enjoys are mandated state renewable energy requirements that drive RE installations regardless of price. 

Aaron Sutch's picture
Aaron Sutch on May 8, 2020

Solar creates jobs, provides resilient energy, and reduces energy burden for Americans. It's a vital part of our return back to a post-COVID sense of normalcy.  This is the beginning of a massive shift away from dirty and expensive fossil fuels which cost us dearly in dirty air, contaminated water and an overheated planet. There is no stopping clean, renewable energy. 

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on May 8, 2020

What do you think the effective components of a solar-type package in a larger stimulus package might be, Aaron? I'm curious what type of mechanisms can and should be put into such legislation to make the most lemonade out of this lemon of a situation. 

Ivy Main's picture
Thank Ivy for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »