This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Contrarian Investors Take Stage at Mid-Atlantic Cleantech Investment Forum

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
EY (Ernst & Young)

Scott Edward Anderson is the founder of the popular blog, The Green Skeptic. A cleantech investor and entrepreneur, he founded VerdeStrategy, and is currently a director with EY's (Ernst &...

  • Member since 2018
  • 184 items added with 54,773 views
  • Apr 17, 2012

 “Energy efficiency is the cleaner energy option that pays for itself,” suggested Mark Fulton to the large crowd gathered for the Mid-Atlantic Cleantech Investment Forum last Thursday evening. “It applies already existing technologies at scale with no government funding and a payback of 2-4 years.” 


Mark Fulton

Fulton is Managing Director and Global Head of Climate Change Investment Research and Strategy with Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors, so he has the data and charts to back up his statements.

His team is currently exploring financing models for energy efficiency, which they believe will generate over $1 trillion in savings over 10-20 years.

“The Empire State Building energy efficiency upgrade demonstrated 30 percent IRRs,” offered Fulton. “So why isn’t anyone investing in it?”

Perhaps it’s the wise investor’s contrarian outlook.

The Forum, now in its 4th year, co-hosted by the Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic and Blank Rome’s Cleantech Group, offered some contrarian suggestions from an investor panel.

The panel included Tucker Twitmyer of EnerTech Capital for whom “efficiency plays have been our bread and butter,” and Lux Capital founder Josh Wolfe, who’s refrain, “it’s a great technology,” belied the fact that not all great technologies make great investments.

It’s such a contrarian outlook, too, that has led to successful investments for Lux, EnerTech, and NRG Energy’s venture arm, and that has cleantech newcomer Edison Ventures looking to capital efficient “cleanweb” models as a way to play in the sandbox. 

The nascent cleanweb movement, initially launched by Sunil Paul at Spring Ventures, brings together web coders to tackle big energy problems. (You can read more about the cleanweb hackathons here.)


Tucker Twitmyer

Twitmyer, who has been investing in clean energy companies and projects for over 10 years, sees parallels with earlier cycles in the space, “LP [limited partners] who haven’t seen the kinds of returns they want have started heading for the exits.”  

But that’s not necessarily time to panic, suggested Wolfe. On the contrary, when the bulk are investors are chasing the next big thing, Wolfe and other successful investors see opportunities in what’s left untouched.


Josh Wolfe

This thesis has paid off handsomely with one such investment, Kurion, which has a solution for addressing toxic nuclear waste, realizing $40 million in profit on $100 million in revenue last year.

The company was one of the few working to clean up the Fukushima nuclear reactors in the wake of the tsunami a year ago

Another panel at the Forum on shale gas development revealed that there’s a growing need for clearly defined regulations in the natural gas sector, especially around well-casing construction and fluids disclosure.  But the panel of experts concluded that sustainable natural gas development is achievable.

Presenting company pitches by new entries in the space rounded out the evening’s program, including Green Power Technologies (the “BERT” people), Matcor, OmniWind, Primus Green Energy and XL Hybrids.

“We need to start talking about cleaner energy, not just clean energy,” offered Fulton in his keynote. “Sixty to seventy percent of American voters support the idea of cleaner energy,” which includes advances to make existing forms of energy better, cleaner and more efficient.

Recognizing there are no silver bullets or magic remedies, fora like this one are designed to call attention to the variety of solutions available. No matter how contrarian they may seem.

(Disclosure: The author is a co-founder of the Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic, which co-hosted the Forum.)

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
Thank Scott Edward for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Apr 19, 2012

Glad to see you’re back to posting.

An old labor investor (me) might lend supplimentary perspectives supporting your capital investor outlook. I agree we are able to reboot economic growth, with common sense.

In the early 80s we had a lot of new technology options, and a lot of over-educated talent looking for work in a battered economy.

My experience was to have lived in run down urban areas while stumbling into advanced core sciences. So momentum took me into pushing the pre-internet in abandoned warehouse spaces. It was strange how quickly the imaginary money people transformed fundamental new communications technology into excess. And those abandoned warehouses got re-named “lofts” with intense financial speculation. People like me headed to the woods, while the imaginary money bubble expanded then burst.

So we are back to a new economic reboot. This time improved energy technologies are essential options. It is VERY important for the imaginary money people to give the labor investors a chance to produce valid new fundamental technologies BEFORE creating too many new bubbles. I think that is your message, too. Maybe shale extraction, I don’t know. Maybe new nuclear, I don’t know. Maybe many things. But we start with ideas, test them, then proceed, or we are chasing a mirage.

In an earlier era, the enthusiasm for railroad development in new spaces probably posed similar conflicts. The capital investor had to sell the rail services before the track was on the ground. However then, many of the great industrial capitalists began their careers as hired labor, with respect for the task. The current political/capital/energy drama is so destructive to the essential trust and respect needed to move forward.

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
Scott Edward Anderson on Apr 19, 2012

Thanks, Rick, for your kind words about my posting. It’s nice to have been missed.


I agree with what I believe you express at the end of your comment that we need to fix the current drama of partisan squabbling and let the investors do their thing.


We can’t afford not to.


Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »