This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Clusterstuck: Are Industry Clusters Really the Holy Grail?

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
EY (Ernst & Young)

Scott Edward Anderson is the founder of the popular blog, The Green Skeptic. A cleantech investor and entrepreneur, he founded VerdeStrategy, and is currently a director with EY's (Ernst &...

  • Member since 2018
  • 184 items added with 55,580 views
  • Jul 20, 2011
Image from

Last week’s report by the Brookings Institution and Battelle Technologies on the clean economy was greeted with much fanfare.  I even wrote about how it ranked the Greater Philadelphia region (where I live) number 5 in the nation.

One of the key success factors the Brookings-Battelle study points to is the creation of industry hubs or clusters, such as the Greater Philadelphia Innovation Cluster for Energy Efficient Buildings. 

I was pleased to see the reference having been a fan and supporter of the GPIC effort.  (As founder of the business network, Cleantech Alliance Mid-Atlantic, I wrote a letter of support to the DOE for Philadelphia’s initial application.)

But then I came across a Washington Post opinion piece by Vivek Wadhwa titled “Industry Clusters: The Modern-Day Snake Oil.”   My skeptic bone, which is located just to the right of the funny bone, in case you are wondering, started to tingle.

Wadhwa points to a recent study conducted by Rune Dahl Fitjar, of Norway’s Centre for Innovation Research at the International Research Institute of Stavanger, and Andres Rodriguez-Pose of the London School of Economics and Political Science, which found that regional and national clusters are, in fact, “irrelevant for innovation.”

Rather, Wadhwa relates, “the key drivers of innovation in Norway are the communication channels that local entrepreneurs maintain to the outside world and their open-mindedness toward foreign cultures, change and new ideas.  Companies that are ‘regionally minded’ — that maintain ties only with players within the same cluster — are four times less likely to innovate than the globally connected.”
What do the researchers say is the determining factor for success?  People.

Not just any people: “knowledgeable people who have the motivation and ability to start ventures,” writes Wadhwa.  Knowledgeable, risk-taking people who are connected by extensive information-sharing networks.

“The same dynamics at play in Norway give Silicon Valley its advantage,” according to Wadhwa.  “It is a giant, globally connected network in which sharing information and risk-taking are the norm.”

Rather than patting ourselves on our backs for developing clusters of innovation, we need to focus on people.  And we need to continuously ask the following questions:

  • Do we have the right people and are we connecting them in ways that will help them start companies?  
  • Are we connecting them with the right mentors and networks and access to financing?   
  • Are we getting government out of the way of their success?  
  • Are we making the pathways to commercialization clear and efficient enough to encourage repaid growth?

If not, we may be creating nothing more than a government-sponsored enduring clusterf*ck that will lead to nothing more than an academic exercise and more fodder for reports.

Scott Edward Anderson's picture
Thank Scott Edward for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Rick Engebretson's picture
Rick Engebretson on Jul 20, 2011

I strongly agree with your concern. And am quite familiar with how our system interferes with individual effort.

I use the operating system Linux on some old PCs. One windowing software platform is KDE, on the API Qt, developed by some Norwegians. Linux was begun by a Finlander, and uses GNU libraries and compiler. The vendor is SuSE (a German company), now part of Novelle. I program low level stuff in FreePascal maintained in The Netherlands. Most of this is directly from US technology, and still held as open source in the US. Much of this is now ported to microcontroller platforms, made outside the US. With microcontrollers, how does one even fabricate a circuit board anymore?

I wish I could offer even more specifics, but protect privacy. The usual political response would be to call me a liar or prove it. To be honest, I don’t know how we are going to become competetive again. I’m about as far out of a cluster as you can get.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »