This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Eric Wesoff's picture
Greentech Media

Prior to joining Greentech Media, Eric Wesoff founded Sage Marketing Partners in 2000 to provide sales and marketing-consulting services to venture-capital firms and their portfolio companies in...

  • Member since 2018
  • 90 items added with 55,301 views


California Approves $415M for Behind-the-Meter Storage, Fuel Cells, Wind and Turbines

California green energy support

California’s Self-Generation Incentive Program is about to be re-authorized by Governor Jerry Brown and will continue to provide $83 million per year (through 2019) for behind-the-meter generation technologies including wind, fuel cells and energy storage.

As early as today, California Governor Jerry Brown is anticipated to sign the funding extension.

The SGIP is the original California renewables incentive, predating the California Solar Initiative. It has historically been used for peak load reduction and solar technology adoption. 

But lately, the SGIP rebate is going more and more toward energy storage applications. With a mandate to add 200 megawatts of energy storage behind the meter by 2020, the SGIP will “really help build the ecosystem,” according to Janice Lin, the chair of Energy Storage North America.

In 2012, the SGIP incentive devoted to energy storage was for just two systems totaling 2 megawatts. In April 2013, there was more than 25 megawatts of energy storage in the SGIP queue. Lin said that there were more applications for energy storage than for any other technology in 2013.

Some details on the SGIP program:

  • The incentive payment is capped at 3 megawatts
  • Wind systems, fuel cells and advanced energy storage systems must be covered by a minimum ten-year warranty
  • Storage can be stand-alone or in tandem with solar or another technology

Here’s the SGIP handbook, the text of the bill, details from the CPUC and a report on the impact of the SGIP.   

Lin sees the SGIP as integral in meeting the 1.3-gigawatt CPUC mandate for storage, especially since 200 megawatts of that energy storage must be customer-sited. Lin encourages the adoption of a “big-picture” viewpoint on energy storage in California. She envisions the aggregation of distributed generation and storage to provide services such as frequency regulation, resource adequacy or flexible capacity to the grid.

For Lin, energy storage is about “using the grid more efficiently.”

“Once the governor signs the bill,” said storage expert Lin, it will “be about big implementation efforts at the PUC.” 


Base SGIP Incentive Levels for Eligible Technologies (from 2013 SGIP Handbook)

Photo Credit: California Energy Financing/shutterstock

greentech mediaGreentech Media (GTM) produces industry-leading news, research, and conferences in the business-to-business greentech market. Our coverage areas include solar, smart grid, energy efficiency, wind, and other non-incumbent energy markets. For more information, visit: , follow us on twitter: @greentechmedia, or like us on Facebook:

Eric Wesoff's picture
Thank Eric for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member


Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Nathan Wilson's picture
Nathan Wilson on Jun 21, 2014

For decades, activists in California and Germany have delayed the (inevitable) transition from fossil fuels to safe clean nuclear power by insisting that renewables would be cheaper than either (despite a preponderance of evidence to the contrary).  I think it is good news that they are finally putting their money were their mouth is (however slowly).

The world is watching, and so far the renewable implementation has not been cheap.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »