This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.


Are Apple and Google Disrupting America's Century-Old Energy Market?

By Gavin Purchas

solartesting_378x235Apple made news earlier this year when it signed an $848-million “direct access” deal to bypass Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and buy clean energy directly from a third-party solar provider. For Apple, the big win was a contract that locked in affordable energy for the next 25 years.

But the deal also set a historical precedent for corporate renewable energy purchases that may, over time, have huge financial implications for traditional utilities.

Energy deals break new ground

With its solar contracts, the iPhone maker is insulating itself from the price volatility that accompanies fossil fuels, in addition to getting power for less than half the cost. Going forward, it can count electricity as a fixed, predictable cost – an attractive proposition that is sure to spark interest among other large buyers of electricity.

Apple’s investment in First Solar’s PV Flats, a 2,900-acre solar array in Monterey, California, also suggests that corporations are ready to take procurement of energy to a new level.

On the heels of Apple’s deal came news that Google signed a 20-year purchase agreement to buy half of the energy produced at the soon-to-be refurbished Altamont Pass wind energy facility. The wind turbines there will power the company’s sprawling Googleplex headquarters in nearby Mountain View, California – again, effectively bypassing the local utility.

Wind is already competitive with coal in many markets and just like Apple, Google will enjoy stable prices for the next two decades.

Companies think beyond cheap energy credits

Corporate procurement of renewables is nothing new, of course. For years already, companies such as Intel and IKEA have purchased renewable energy credits, or RECs, to meet their sustainability goals.

Over time, however, these credits became so popular that we now have a glut of nearly worthless RECS with some going for as little as 75 cents per kilowatt-hour. As a corporate procurement activity, they now amount to little more than “greenwashing” because the low prices undermine the REC market as a force for new investments.

This criticism has prompted some investors such as Whole Foods and PepsiCo to scale back and instead focus on more tangible, onsite renewable projects at their own facilities.

Or, as in the case of Apple and Google, to think outside the box. Large power purchase agreements, like the ones the companies just announced, may prove to be a game changer.

Such deals give renewable energy providers the collateral they need to approach a bank or other investor about financing the construction of their plants. And it helps them get a cheaper line of credit which, in turn, will bolster additional investments in renewables.

Energy providers respond

Historically, power purchase agreements have been long-term commitments of up to 30 years.

But now that model is changing, too, further broadening participation in new and innovative clean energy programs.

MP2 Energy, a retail electric supplier in Texas, for example, recognized the limitations of the longer contracts. The company developed a landmark, two-year solar energy procurement proposal that attracted Rice University, and the parties announced a contract in February 2015.

Today, corporate buyers of energy are trying new ways and they’re finding energy providers willing to experiment. From Apple to Rice University, a growing cadre of large buyers are making smart business deals that also help pave the way for renewable energy development.

As more buyers of energy move in this direction, pressure will build on utilities to find new business models – and new revenue streams that are not based on volume sales or on the construction of new, fossil-fired plants.

Or they may soon be looking at a major corporate exodus to their competitors in the clean energy business – and at a major disruption of the market they’ve owned for more than a century.

This post originally appeared on our Voices blog

Photo Source: Flickr/DOE

EDF  Energy Exchange's picture

Thank EDF for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on May 14, 2015 5:23 pm GMT

Gavin, if Apple is “bypassing” PG&E, why is the utility spending $millions on building a substation and making transmission improvements? And how do you think the solar energy coming out of California Flats is going to make the 180-mile trip to Apple headquarters in Cupertino, and their 52 CA retail stores, and a computer center (according to Apple CEO Tim Cook)?

Answer: it’s not. It’s going to be dumped into the CAISO grid, along with Pacificorp’s Wyoming coal generation and whatever else happens to be contributing to meet demand each moment. Apple isn’t bypassing anyone – they’re using the grid mix like everyone else. And PG&E will be billing all their customers for the additional $10 million each year, to which the California Public Utilities Commission says the utility is entitled, as a Transmission Access Charge.

Yes, they’ve owned those wires for more than a century, but they’re only getting more valuable.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »