This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Julio Diaz Cohen's picture
Regional Commercial Director for Structuring and Analytics AES

Professional with more than +23 years of international career in liberalized energy markets with extensive knowledge in the electricity and natural gas businesses and markets. His areas of...

  • Member since 2021
  • 2 items added with 633 views
  • Apr 13, 2021
  • 633 views

Natural gas could be part of the future carbon neutral rather than a bridge. Despite the promise of being completely replaced by hydrogen one day in the future, natural gas has proven to serve as a hydrogen carrier to facilitate efficient use of existing gas infrastructure, a multi-million dollar investment that should not be neglected in the way to be greener. An 80% / 20% methane / hydrogen mixture has been successfully tested in the UK and France, powering 100 homes and a hospital boiler without any new equipment along the pipeline or in the buildings. Perhaps our carbon neutral and hydrogen future is more closely tied to natural gas than what we initially thought. There is not doubt that natural gas will play a leading role in this new energy future.

Julio Diaz Cohen's picture
Thank Julio for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Apr 13, 2021

Julio, I have a proposal that would serve as insurance, for future generations, that the idea of a "carbon-neutral" or "net-zero" future isn't merely an excuse to continue natural gas or oil extraction indefinitely: make each cubic foot of fossil fuel extraction contingent on sequestering a carbon-equivalent amount of CO2 in advance. If Chevron or Shell wants to extract another billion cubic feet of methane, require either to verifiably sequester a billion cubic feet of CO2 first.
Though it seems to be a reasonable commitment to expect of any reputable oil or gas company, I can't interest any in making it. Why?
 

Julio Diaz Cohen's picture
Julio Diaz Cohen on Apr 15, 2021

Bob, thanks for the comment. I agreed with you, that it will be an important step on the path to a greener future, but I am not sure if the demand is willing to pay the additional cost now, if not, it will be difficult for a single company to implement it. The use of gas as a hydrogen carrier is to facilitate the massive distribution of hydrogen while the cost of the technology is reduced. We should look for achieving  100% clean energy in the not too distant future.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Apr 15, 2021

The use of gas as a hydrogen carrier is to facilitate the massive distribution of hydrogen while the cost of the technology is reduced. 

So are you seeing hydrogen being more useful in the short term as direct energy (in the same heating/cooking applications gas is used today) than any sort of hydrogen-to-power implementation? Obviously the latter comes with lots of energy losses so it's suboptimal, but I also wonder how much the former will act to give today's carbon-emitting gas a lifetime longer than perhaps it warrants in lieu of electrification

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »