This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Post

Mass storage is a solved problem

image credit: Global PHES Atlas, 150 GWh pumped hydro site in Alabama
Andrew Blakers's picture
Professor of Engineering Australian National university

Andrew Blakers is Professor of Engineering at the Australian National University. He founded the solar PV research group at ANU. In the 1980s and 1990s he was responsible for the design and...

  • Member since 2021
  • 124 items added with 8,166 views
  • May 18, 2022
  • 362 views

Very large-scale storage is required for an energy system based upon variable solar and wind.

There already exists a highly credible, off-the-shelf, low-cost, low-environmental-impact energy storage technology that is unconstrained by raw material availability, that has already been deployed at a scale of 200 GW, and that is available at unlimited scale nearly everywhere. This technology is Pumped Hydro Energy Storage (PHES).

There is a twist: nearly all the good PHES sites are located away from rivers, for the simple reason that most of the global landscape is not near a river.

PHES can be readily scaled to any required storage capacity at a known and affordable cost. Future storage technological development may further reduce the cost of storage. However, existing PHES technology sets a robust upper bound on the cost of storage that is already highly affordable and highly available in almost every country.

The key point

Companies and governments can confidently proceed with Terawatt-scale deployment of low- cost, variable solar and wind in the knowledge that at least one highly credible, scalable and affordable energy storage technology already exists. No arm-waving is required about future cost reductions, and there are minimal resource constraints.

Off-river PHES

Off-river PHES involves pumping water uphill from one reservoir to another at a higher elevation for storage. When power is needed, water is released to flow downhill through turbines, generating electricity on its way to the lower reservoir.

For example, a pair of 100-hectare reservoirs with 20-m average depth, spaced a few km apart, connected with a tunnel, and with an altitude difference of 600 meters, can store 24 Gigawatt-hours (GWh) of energy, meaning the system could supply 1 Gigawatt of power for 24 hours.

The reservoirs can be constructed in hilly country away from any river, or could be existing lakes or reservoirs. Because most sites are away from any river, there is no need for flood control or new dams on rivers. The annual operating cost is low, and the system lifetime is 50-100 years. The working fluid is water. There is no requirement for difficult materials such as lithium and cobalt.

The Global Atlas

The ANU Global PHES Atlas lists 616,000 sites with a combined storage capacity of 23 million GWh, which is about 100 times more than needed to support a global 100% renewable energy system. The US has 35,000 good sites with combined storage of 1.4 million GWh.

Hour-by-hour analysis over many years of several countries suggest that storage of about 2 GW of storage power for one day (50 GWh of storage energy) per million people is sufficient to support a 100% renewable energy system in an affluent country, depending on a range of local factors. The land and water requirement is very small: in the range of 4 m2 per person and 4 litres per day per person respectively.

The future of PHES

Little pumped storage has been built in recent years because there hasn’t been much need, but that’s changing. In 2021, about three-quarters of all new power capacity was either solar or wind. Costs are falling, making solar & wind cheaper in most areas than fossil fuel energy.

Australia is installing solar and wind 2-3 times faster per capita than the U.S. and generates twice as much solar electricity per capita as the next most "solarized" countries (Netherlands, Germany, Japan).  Australia is already facing the need for mass storage. It has three existing PHES systems; two new PHES systems are under construction (Snowy 2.0, Kidston) that have more energy storage than all the utility batteries in the world put together; and another dozen are under serious consideration. None involve new dams on rivers.

The Australian experience is highly replicable since it relies on cheap, mature technology from vast production runs that utilize vastly available resources. The US looks much like Australia (except 13X bigger population) and may follow the path that Australia is on, driven by similar market forces.  In particular, off-river pumped hydro offers unlimited, mature, low-cost storage potential with low environmental and social costs.

Thousands of 50 GWh pumped storage sites, including in unlikely states such as Texas, Alabama and West Virginia

 

Andrew Blakers's picture
Thank Andrew for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Jim Stack's picture
Jim Stack on May 18, 2022

Pumped water storage is great. But it doesn't respond quickly and it takes a lot of energy to store the water. It really works much better is paired with Battery Storage. Then you get the quick response of Battery Storage and the long power output of the hydro storage after it is released.   

Andrew Blakers's picture
Andrew Blakers on May 18, 2022

Actually, pumped storage responds in a few tens of seconds to minutes. This is plenty fast enough for almost all purposes, noting that weather systems take hours to cross a state. It also offers mechanical inertia and black start capability.

Sometimes its advantageous to top up flat batteries, but only when the advantage outweighs the double round trip storage loss.

Pumped hydro costs far less than batteries for storage of hours to days. Batteries win out for high power short term storage.

Michael Keller's picture
Michael Keller on May 23, 2022

FYI. The environmentalists are knocking down the dams. 

Andrew Blakers's picture
Andrew Blakers on May 24, 2022

You've missed the point. These are off-river sites. There are no dams on rivers to knock down.

 

Michael Keller's picture
Michael Keller on May 25, 2022

The impoundments typically require some form of dam or structure to hold water. One actually failed spectacularly in Missouri.

Andrew Blakers's picture
Andrew Blakers on May 25, 2022

There are no rivers in sight. The amount of stored water is very small compared with river-based reservoirs - about 1 GL per GWh of storage.

There are vast numbers of water-holding structures around the world. Sometimes someone or something stuffs up.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »