This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

PJ Davis's picture
Content Manager | Editor | On-Line Event Producer Energy Central

FAVORITE STORY: 'The Mc-Webcast'​ * Power outage, T-Minus 15 minutes to webcast start; laptop in hand, ran down the 11 flights from the office to the car and bolted over to the McDonald's next...

  • Member since 2001
  • 598 items added with 1,091,648 views
  • Dec 1, 2020
  • 605 views

According to the article, as recently as 2011, Exxon was America’s most valuable company, period. Today, differnt story.

PJ Davis's picture
Thank PJ for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 2, 2020

PJ, no - NextEra didn't "topple Exxon-Mobil from its place as America’s top energy company", and never will. NextEra surpassed Exxon-Mobil in market capitalization for exactly 1 (one) day in November.

Do you know what market capitalization is? I'll tell you, because most people don't: it's the market value of outstanding shares of a publicly-traded company's stock. In other words: If NextEra put out a PR blitz that impressed impressionable solar and wind advocates, who then went out and bought its stock, it could possibly have briefly had a perceived value which was multiples of its assets, or earnings. In assets or earnings, the things that really matter to investors, Exxon-Mobil towers over tiny upstart NextEra.

Today, "differnt" story? No - with renewables, it's the same, old, tired story. 100% hype, that's even more damaging than coal for climate, species diversity, sea level rise, and ocean acidification.

Please - at least get the story straight.

Kristen Jaeger's picture
Kristen Jaeger on Dec 2, 2020

Hi Bob,

I am interested in what you see as hype with renewables and why you believe they are more damaging than coal.  I can possibly see the point you are making with offshore wind, but this is only one type of renewable energy.  I am interested in hearing your counterpoint, because most people I speak with are 100 percent on board with renewables.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Dec 2, 2020

Hi Kristen

I think the value of solar and wind is exaggerated by people who don't understand electricity must be generated as it's used. Many seem to think once electricity is generated it sits in transmission wires, waiting for someone to turn on their clothes dryer, or flatscreen TV.

Electricity supply must be generated in real time to precisely meet demand - an extremely complicated process. That the sun and wind don't generate the right amount of electricity exactly when it's needed creates a host of problems: when they generate too much, the electricity must be curtailed, or turned off (otherwise transmission wires would melt from their towers - literally). When they don't generate enough, it must be augmented by electricity from natural gas power plants. Otherwise, your lights would dim; your electronic devices would start to behave erratically.

Due to nighttime and cloud cover, solar panels in the U.S. generate, on average, 20% of their maximum capacity. That means 80% of the time, natural gas must be burned to generate the missing electricity. Until customers are willing to only use their appliances when the sun is shining it will be that way.

Recently, researchers have discovered 2.3% of natural gas (methane) is leaked into the atmosphere during production. Because natural gas is 80x worse than CO2 as a greenhouse gas, and natural gas is required to provide 80% of the power needed to back up solar, the combination ends up being worse than burning coal to generate electricity. Not all the time; sometimes it's better, sometimes it's worse. But that's the average.

Hydropower is a different story. By closing gates that let water flow to turbines. operators at hydroelectric plants can adjust electrical output as necessary to meet demand. But unfortunately, hydropower is not considered renewable in many states. Why? Because it would diminish sales of solar panels, wind turbines, and natural gas. Unfortunately, it all comes down to money.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »