This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Sebastian Klaczynski's picture
Entrepreneur, PDI Conversa - Sebastian Klaczynski

In my 25-year professional career, I have gained unique experience, consisting in the simultaneous management of processes and organization in the areas of: sales, production and R&D. In the...

  • Member since 2022
  • 6 items added with 727 views
  • Sep 8, 2022

The concept of decarbonization has dominated media coverage in recent years. We are slowly forgetting that this is part of a wider project that limits the emission of all greenhouse gases. Although CO2 emissions are actually dominant, this gas has a GWP (Global Warming Potential) = 1. In the article attached below, the authors refer to the scope of application of artificially produced SF6 insulation gas. It is an excellent insulating medium, which is biologically neutral in a stable state and has unique insulating properties. However, when an arc occurs, its decomposition products are extremely toxic. In addition, a very important issue is the topic raised by the author of the publication, which I will supplement with a simplified estimate: for each turbine in the ring system, there are on average three distribution bays with SF6 insulated. Each distribution bay contains approximately 0.2 kg of SF6 gas. So what is the CO2 equivalent in the system of 100 wind turbines?
 Well, it is 100 x 3 x 0.2 kg x 22,800 (GWP SF6) = 1,368,000 kg CO2.

Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Sep 8, 2022

Does all of that SF6 get emitted with every turbine? Or is controlling that part of the growing recycling programs for turbines?

Sebastian Klaczynski's picture
Sebastian Klaczynski on Sep 9, 2022


Gas is not emitted by the distribution devices containing it. It is closed in sealed tanks and is controlled. The problem exists elsewhere: we produce artificial gas (not found in nature) with the highest possible GWP, although we can use mixtures of atmospheric gases (excluding CO2), the use of which gives similar effects to the use of SF6. There is simply no logic in it.

Sebastian Klaczynski's picture
Thank Sebastian for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »