This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.


Floating wind and hydrogen

Charley Rattan's picture
World Hydrogen Leader Charley Rattan Associates

UK based offshore wind & hydrogen corporate advisor and trainer; Faculty member World Hydrogen Leaders. Delivering global hydrogen and offshore wind corporate investment advice, business...

  • Member since 2019
  • 3,772 items added with 2,536,950 views
  • Nov 18, 2021

Floating Wind and Hydtogen


Floating wind and hydrogen



Interest in my article offshore wind and hydrogen encouraged me to once more reach for the virtual ‘pen’ and delve into the area of floating wind.

In some respects, floating wind is the ‘new kid on the block’ of the wind industry although one with which I’ve been involved with for years floating-offshore-wind-revisited. The first operational site ‘Hywind’ is situated off the coast of Aberdeen in Scotland and after the first few years of operation, is generating with capacity factors approaching 60%, something deemed impossible not so long ago.

There are both advantages and disadvantages to floating wind and added complexity when considering hybrid schemes with technologies involving hydrogen production and electrolysis onshore, offshore, or even within the turbine.

Currently, floating offshore wind is much more expensive than its fixed-bottom counterpart, but as with its predecessor, as the industry scales it may be that cost reductions occur, and the industry can become price competitive.

Obviously, there is a reduced expense for the steel needed in the foundations as they do not go right down to the seabed but are instead anchored by cables and weights. Because of this there is a flexibility on siting, releasing floating offshore wind arrays free from these constraints relating to the ground conditions; sea-depth become less critical and deep-water conditions open up most of the global seabed.

Wind farms usually require cabling from the foundation down to the seabed. The cable is then trenched a metre deep through the seabed back to the ‘beach’ and onwards to the substation. This method is so routine that it was still used by the otherwise hugely innovative Hywind at Buchan deeps.

No alt text provided for this image

As the industry innovates, we can anticipate more dynamic cabling – perhaps using buoys under the surface to get to shore. This will greatly reduce both the amount of cable required and the environmental impact on the seabed. This form of moving cabling is not without controversy; stakeholders such as the fishing community and those involved in protecting diving birds will have plenty to say, but this kind of cabling may make de-commissioning easier and is something upon which we can expect continued development.

Floating machines can be made at remotely at what Shell - a floating wind and hydrogen market re-entrant - terms, slightly oddly, ‘the beach’. The machines can be manufactured and assembled at the quayside enabling industrial scale mass production and the associated cost reductions. Once assembled they are simply towed out to sea 'plugged in' and planted on site.

The streamlined mass production envisaged for floating offshore wind means scaling is possible and the industry can realistically build sites much further out to sea where harsher conditions prevail. This process also avoids challenges around expensive specialist jack-up and installation vessels, an industry choke point to date and greatly reduces the cost.

Fixed foundations require favourable seabed conditions and work up to around 30 metres; deeper than that and the amount of steel becomes prohibitive. Floating machines, anchored with cables are, in theory at least, freed from these geographical constraints.

This does not necessarily mean that floating wind farms will immediately go further out to sea as the cable will still need to reach the shore which will need to be factored into a project. However, deeper waters, close to major population centres and sites previously ruled out as being too deep, are now very much back and there is a new technology namely hydrogen which may mean that schemes much further out can be viable.

No alt text provided for this image

As reflected in offshore wind and hydrogen, combining floating wind and hydrogen to make gas from air represents a significant global opportunity.

One of the problems faced by the offshore wind sector has been finding suitable commitment from the grid bodies often involving shareholders who may baulk at the costs involved in providing connections in unfamiliar terrain, hundreds of miles at sea on projects that may or may not come to fruition.

No alt text provided for this image

it is difficult for grid planners to work on that basis; if, however, hydrogen production rather than electrical generation was the main reason for the new sites, then a game-changing situation exists. The relatively constraint-free floating wind and associated electrolysis and infrastructure could be sited near existing oil and gas assets and a pipeline network which may be suitable for distributing the finished hydrogen to shore. This is not fanciful the dolphyn project off Aberdeen is already in the public domain and oil and gas majors BP, Total and Shell are all engaged, with sites being assessed. One to watch with interest is Scotland’s ScotWind leasing round where around four gigawatts of floating wind development is being scoped. Sites off California, Wales, Holland, Germany, Norway, and Ireland are all being actively considered.

I'm tracking developments closely and will bring you insights as they occur – for the most up to date news, join the Floating Wind and hydrogen professional group; 

Watch out for my forthcoming two day course on Floating Wind and Hydrogen.


Charley Rattan




Roger Arnold's picture
Roger Arnold on Nov 19, 2021

Running long underwater power cables to shore from a floating offshore wind turbine anchorage is an expensive proposition. For that matter, even the anchorage itself can be very expensive, if the turbine is operating far offshore in deep water. Far offshore is desirable, because that's where the best, most reliable winds are found. So what to do, oh what to do?

Well, one interesting possibility: free sailing wind-industrial platforms. Don't try to anchor in deep water, don't try to export electricity directly to shore. Use it on the mobile platform itself.

There are a number of energy-intensive applications that could easily be carried aboard a mobile sea-borne platform. Production of green hydrogen is an obvious example, although the difficulty of storing and transporting hydrogen to shore makes green hydrogen less than ideal. Better might be production of green ammonia, or production of synthetic diesel and jet fuels. Production of synthetic hydrocarbons would require a source of CO2. Captured CO2 could be delivered via supply ships, or a DAC facility could be built on the platform.

Charley Rattan's picture
Thank Charley for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »