This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.


Distant Nuclear Fusion

image credit:
John Benson's picture
John Benson 74298
Senior Consultant Microgrid Labs

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Microgrid Labs, Inc. Advisor: 2014 to Present Developed product plans, conceptual and preliminary designs for projects, performed industry surveys and developed...

  • Member since 2013
  • 742 items added with 507,893 views
  • Jan 12, 2021

This item is part of the Special Issue - 2021-01 - Predictions and Trends, click here for more

Access Publication

There are currently two experiments that are designed to reach “break-even” fusion within the next several years, but this means that the experiment will inject as much energy into the inner, or core process as comes out in the form of high energy neutrons. Forget any energy-conversion efficiencies outside of the core – no electric energy will come out of these initial facilities in spite of huge amounts going in.

One of these two projects, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is in Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France. The other, the National Ignition Facility (NIF) is here in my home town of Livermore, California.

Your access to Member Features is limited.

This post is a brief review of the former and a more thorough review of the latter, including its distant past and distant future.

John Benson's picture
Thank John for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.
Matt Chester's picture
Matt Chester on Jan 12, 2021

Great to see the funding of important potential moonshots that could really change the game-- that's why these government programs exist!

John Benson's picture
John Benson on Jan 12, 2021

Thanks for the comment, Matt.

Doing good basic science could result in all types of future products, and not just in the far distant future. 


Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jan 12, 2021

John, FYI on November 1 net energy production was achieved at NIF. From a colleague:

"The November 1 shot yielded 99 kJ of energy, a new record.  Preliminary analysis puts its q-alpha at 1.2, which would make it a burning plasma."

John Benson's picture
John Benson on Jan 13, 2021

Hi Bob, thanks for the information.

The most impressive thing to me is LIFE - they have started to develop a viable path to commercialization, including looking at the economics. 


Bob Meinetz's picture
Bob Meinetz on Jan 13, 2021

NIF is an amazing facility. 192 lasers can deliver .6 kWh of energy to a target the size of a pencil eraser.

".6 kilowatthours?', one might say. "I pay PG&E 12¢ for that much energy. How much are taxpayers paying for this blasted thing?!".

But it's not how much energy they deliver that's important, it's how fast they do it. The pulse, lasting one billionth of a second, requires 2.15 petawatts of power (2,150,000,000,000,000 watts) - roughly 3 times the ouput capacity of all nuclear plants in the U.S. combined.

Though NIF's research is more applicable to design of thermonuclear weapons today, it all adds to the collective pool of research driving fusion energy research forward. The hard part is containment - sustaining a tiny reaction hotter than the surface of the sun for more than a billionth of a second.

John Benson's picture
John Benson on Jan 14, 2021

The date that LLNL suggested for their first commercial design (LIFE Gen 3 design) is 2040, and I believe this is realistic, assuming they continue to get the funding they need. Although the LIFE Projects have less interest for DOD (and their deep projects) hopefully the overall project (LIFE, NIF and Weapons Stewardship/development) will benefit from more cost-effective processes, and thus DOD will partner with DOE to support LIFE.


Audra Drazga's picture
Audra Drazga on Jan 26, 2021

John, it seems like nuclear is left off most Clean Energy agendas.  Do you think this new technology could help pave the way into bringing nuclear back into the fold? 

John Benson's picture
John Benson on Jan 26, 2021

Yes, but around 2040.

LLNL has made remarkable progress to date. Its key advantage over fusion is that it has very low nuclear waste. Also, assuming a D-T reaction, deuterium is quite abundant, and a fusion reactor breeds its on tritium (from lithium). 

There are also market niches where solar and wind have problems competing (like in the far north). Starting commercialization here will allow them the technology to drive down costs further, and perhaps move closer to the mainstream.

Regarding fission, NuScale continues to make progress on several fronts (maybe a future post). It also looks like it can occupy several niches in the short term.


Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »