This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.

Bob Meinetz's picture
Nuclear Power Policy Activist Independent

I am a passionate advocate for the environment and nuclear energy. With the threat of climate change, I’ve embarked on a mission to help overcome the fears of nuclear energy. I’ve been active in...

  • Member since 2018
  • 6,979 items added with 239,816 views
  • May 28, 2021
  • 306 views

"Burning trees and other biomass is often erroneously categorized as zero-carbon or carbon neutral energy. But while burning biomass instead of fossil fuels may produce paper 'reductions' in emissions, the atmosphere is not fooled.

The fact is that burning wood emits more carbon pollution per unit of energy than even coal. And because burning wood adds carbon to the atmosphere much faster than trees can grow back to sequester it, replacing fossil fuels with forest wood can increase net greenhouse gas emissions for decades or even centuries.

For the disastrous consequences of a policy that pays people to burn trees for energy, the European Union and Britain are prime examples. Bioenergy incentives are driving catastrophic levels of illegal logging in the last ancient forests of Eastern Europe and have created an export wood-pellet industry in the U.S.CanadaRussia and the Baltics that did not even exist 10 years ago. Entire forests are felled, ground up, turned into pellets and sent up smokestacks in the EU, the U.K., Japan and Korea.

The Google Earth images below show an example of the scale of this folly. The wood harvested from this 67-acre clear-cut of North Carolina native forest by Enviva, the largest wood pellet company in the world, would run the wood-burning units at the U.K.’s Drax power station for about three and a half hours. 

Drax formerly ran solely on coal. Now it continues to burn coal but also collects about $2.8 million per day in renewable energy subsidies for its wood-burning units – money paid by unsuspecting U.K. ratepayers who think they are supporting clean energy."

Bob Meinetz's picture
Thank Bob for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member
Discussions
Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »