This special interest group is for professionals to connect and discuss all types of carbon-free power alternatives, including nuclear, renewable, tidal and more.


You need to be a member of Energy Central to access some features and content. Please or register to continue.


Alberta, B.C. Polls Show Strong Support for Net-Zero, Low Buy-In for LNG

Wind power turbine

Dennis Schroeder/NREL/Flickr

More than two-thirds of Albertans support a 2050 target for net-zero emissions, and six in 10 British Columbians back clean energy over liquefied natural gas (LNG) development, according to separate research released last week by the Pembina Institute and Clean Energy Canada.

In Alberta, a poll by Calgary-based Janet Brown Opinion Research found that 68% support net-zero by 2050, 63% think their provincial government’s efforts “have not been effective in enhancing the reputation of Alberta’s oil and gas industry outside the province,” and 61% favour dialogue and cooperation with environmental advocates to improve the province’s environmental performance, Pembina says in a release.

The survey results “reveal that Albertans expect a much stronger focus on climate action than is being offered,” said Alberta Director Chris Severson-Baker. “It’s clear that Albertans take climate action seriously and recognize it’s important for Alberta’s future prosperity. They want their government to take the steps needed to decarbonize heavy industry, which would unlock major capital investment. This means creating stable, forward-looking climate policy that aligns with Canada’s federal government targets and the targets of more than 100 other countries, now representing more than 70% of global emissions.”

“When it comes to government spending, most British Columbians (61%) would like to see the government focus more on developing renewables such as hydroelectricity, hydrogen, and clean technology, while fewer than one-quarter (22%) prefer a focus on LNG,” Clean Energy Canada writes, based on a survey it commissioned from Stratcom. “A strong majority think the province should prioritize combating climate change,” with 61% listing the climate crisis as a major concern and 18% saying it should be the top priority for Premier John Horgan’s new majority government.

“Almost three-quarters (73%) support policies that make pollution-intensive products and activities gradually more expensive, if at the same time these policies also make climate-friendly alternatives cheaper and more available,” Clean Energy Canada adds. “This view is held across partisan lines, with 79% of NDP voters, 66% of Liberal voters, 86% of Green voters, and 66% of undecided voters in support,” and only 17% opposed.

“B.C. has a proud history of climate action, and it’s clear that British Columbians want to see the province build on that progress,” said Clean Energy Canada Executive Director Merran Smith. “Critically, they want a sustainable economy that’s built on a resilient clean energy foundation, not on fossil fuels. They understand that this is how we keep our province safer, healthier, and globally competitive in the new decade.”

Read More

The Energy  Mix's picture

Thank The Energy for the Post!

Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.


Spell checking: Press the CTRL or COMMAND key then click on the underlined misspelled word.

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »